The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
Correlates of direct care staffs’ attitudes towards aggression of persons with intellectual disabilities
Open accessAbstract
Background and aim To explain direct care staff's attitudes (responsive or rejecting) towards aggression of clients with intellectual disability (ID), data were collected about client characteristics as well as individual and team characteristics of 475 direct care staff members, working in 71 teams. Method and results Multilevel analyses revealed that a positive team climate was positively associated with both a rejecting and responsive attitude towards aggression. Senior staff members and females showed a less responsive attitude towards aggression, whereas a relatively high percentage of females in a team and a positive attitude towards external professionals were associated with a more responsive attitude towards aggression. Unexpectedly, staff who experienced less verbal and/or physical aggressive incidents of their clients with ID showed a more rejecting attitude towards aggression. Finally, characteristics of the clients with ID accounted for the largest part of the variance in the attitude towards aggression of direct care staff, in particular psychiatric diagnoses. Conclusions and implications Further research is necessary in order to understand how team processes affect the attitude towards aggression of direct care staff. Further it is recommended to provide direct care staff with knowledge about mental disorders in clients with ID.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 40 · Cited by 12
Research works printed but not linked: 40
- Allen, 1999, Mediator analysis: An overview of recent research on carers supporting people with intellectual disability and challenging behaviour, Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 43, 325, 10.1046/j.1365-2788.1999.00209.x · DOI
- Anderson, 1998, Measuring climate for work group innovation: Development and validation of the team climate inventory, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 19, 235, 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1379(199805)19:3<235::AID-JOB837>3.0.CO;2-C · DOI
- Brewer, 1999, The psychology of prejudice: Ingroup love of Outgroup hate?, Journal of Social Issues, 55, 429, 10.1111/0022-4537.00126 · DOI · Paper page
- Broadhurst, 2007, Organizational and individual factors associated with breakdown of residential placements for people with intellectual disabilities, Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 51, 293, 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2006.00876.x · DOI
- Chester, 2010, Diagnosing personality disorder in people with learning disabilities, Learning Disability Practice, 13, 14, 10.7748/ldp2010.10.13.8.14.c8017 · DOI
- Christensen, 2013, Oppositional Defiant Disorder in children with intellectual disabilities, Journal of Mental Health Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 6, 225, 10.1080/19315864.2012.661033 · DOI
- de Bakker, 2014, The use of restricting measures in the care: The perception of youth with a mild intellectual disability, Nederlands Tijdschrift voor de Zorg aan mensen met verstandelijke beperkingen, 40, 128
- Crocker, 2006, Prevalence and types of aggressive behaviour among adults with intellectual disabilities, Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 50, 652, 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2006.00815.x · DOI
- Didden, 2006, Behavioral treatment of challenging behaviors in individuals with mental retardation: Meta-analysis of single-subject research, American Journal on Mental Retardation, 111, 290, 10.1352/0895-8017(2006)111[290:BTOCBI]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
- Duxbury, 2011, Deaths in custody; the role of restraint, Journal of Learning Disabilities and Offending Behaviour, 2, 178, 10.1108/20420921111207873 · DOI
- Embregts, 2002, Effects of video feedback on social behaviour of youngh people with mild intellectual disability and staff responses, International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 49, 105, 10.1080/10349120120115361 · DOI
- Fish, 2005, The last resort? Staff and client perspectives on physical intervention, Journal of Intellectual Disabilities, 9, 93, 10.1177/1744629505049726 · DOI
- Grey, 2005, Evidence-based practices in intellectual disability and behaviour disorders, Current Opinion in Psychiatry, 18, 469, 10.1097/01.yco.0000179482.54767.cf · DOI
- Harvey, 2009, Updating a meta-analysis of intervention research with challenging behaviour: Treatment validity and standards of practice, Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability, 34, 67, 10.1080/13668250802690922 · DOI · Paper page
- Hastings, 2002, Behavioural knowledge, causal beliefs and self-efficacy as predictors of special educators” emotional reactions to challenging behaviours, Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 46, 144, 10.1046/j.1365-2788.2002.00378.x · DOI
- Hawkins, 2005, The use of physical interventions with people with intellectual disabilities and challenging behaviour .The experiences of service users and staff members, Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 18, 19, 10.1111/j.1468-3148.2004.00207.x · DOI
- Hensel, 2012, Exposure to client aggression and burnout among community staff who support adults with intellectual disabilities in Ontario, Canada, Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 56, 910, 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2011.01493.x · DOI
- Hensel, 2013, Staff perception of aggressive behaviour in community services for adults with intellectual disabilities, Community Mental Health Journal
- Heyvaert, 2012, A multilevel meta- analysis of single-case and small-n research on interventions for reducing challenging behaviour in persons with intellectual disabilities, Research in Developmental Disabilities, 33, 766, 10.1016/j.ridd.2011.10.010 · DOI
- Howard, 2009, The psychological impact of violence on staff working with adults with intellectual disabilities, Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 22, 538, 10.1111/j.1468-3148.2009.00496.x · DOI
- Jansen, 2005, An international comparative study on the reliability and validity of the attitudes towards aggression scale, International Journal of Nursing Studies, 42, 467, 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2004.09.007 · DOI
- Jansen, 2006, Cross-cultural differences in psychiatric nurses’ attitudes to inpatient aggression, Archives of Psychiatric Nursing, 20, 82, 10.1016/j.apnu.2005.08.012 · DOI
- Kivimäki, 1999, A short version of the Team Climate Inventory: Development and psychometric properties, Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 72, 241, 10.1348/096317999166644 · DOI
- Knotter, 2013, Staff’s attitudes and reactions towards aggressive behaviour of clients with intellectual disabilities: A multi- level study, Research in Developmental Disabilities, 34, 1397, 10.1016/j.ridd.2013.01.032 · DOI
- Lowe, 2007, Challenging behaviours: Prevalence and topographies, Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 51, 625, 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2006.00948.x · DOI
- Mills, 2011, The relationship between challenging behaviour, burnout and cognitive variables in staff working with people who have intellectual disabilities, Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 55, 844, 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2011.01438.x · DOI
- Oliver, 2007, Modified Overt Aggression Scale (MOAS) for people with intellectual disability and aggressive challenging behaviour: A reliability study, Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 20, 368, 10.1111/j.1468-3148.2006.00346.x · DOI
- Ouwens, 2009, Meten van teamklimaat, Kwaliteit van zorg, 4, 14
- Paclawskyj, 2004, Functional assessment of problem behaviors in adults with mental retardation, Behavior Modification, 28, 649, 10.1177/0145445503259834 · DOI
- Phillips, 2010, Predicting placement breakdown: Individual and environmental factors associated with the success or failure of community residential placements for adults with intellectual disabilities, Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 23, 201, 10.1111/j.1468-3148.2009.00530.x · DOI
- Rose, 2006, Attitudes of direct care staff towards external professionals, team climate and psychological wellbeing: A pilot study, Journal of Intellectual Disabilities, 10, 105, 10.1177/1744629506064008 · DOI
- Rose, 2013, Client characteristics, organizational variables and burnout in care staff: The mediating role of fear of assault, Research in Developmental Disabilities, 34, 940, 10.1016/j.ridd.2012.11.014 · DOI
- Rose, 1999, Stress and residential staff who work with people who have an intellectual disability: A factor analytic study, Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 422, 268, 10.1046/j.1365-2788.1999.00210.x · DOI
- Sameroff, 2010, A unified theory of development: A dialectic integration of nature and nurture, Child Development, 81, 6, 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2009.01378.x · DOI · Paper page
- Strating, 2009, Psychometric test of the Team Climate Inventory-short version investigated in Dutch quality improvement teams, BMC Health Services Research, 9, 126, 10.1186/1472-6963-9-126 · DOI
- Tenneij, 2008, Incidence, types and characteristics of aggressive behaviour in treatment facilities for adults with mild intellectual disability and severe challenging behaviour, Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 52, 114, 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2007.00968.x · DOI
- Tyrer, 2006, Physical aggression towards others in adults with learning disabilities: Prevalence and associated factors, Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 50, 295, 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2005.00774.x · DOI
- Willems, 2010, The relation between intrapersonal and interpersonal staff behaviour towards clients with ID and challenging behaviour: A validation study of the Staff-Client Interactive Behaviour Inventory, Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 54, 40, 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2009.01226.x · DOI
- Wilner, 2013, Group based cognitive-behavioural anger management for people with mild to moderate intellectual disabilities: Cluster randomized control trial, The British Journal of Psychiatry, 203, 288, 10.1192/bjp.bp.112.124529 · DOI
- Yamagishi, 2009, Social exchange and solidarity: In-group love or out-group hate?, Evolution and Human Behaviour, 30, 229, 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2009.02.004 · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- Knotter, M. H., Stams, G. J. J. M., Moonen, X. M. H., & Wissink, I. B.
- Affiliations
- De Twentse Zorgcentra (NL)
- University of Amsterdam (NL)
- Zuyd University of Applied Sciences (NL)
- Corresponding author
- Knotter, M.H.
- Venue
- Research in Developmental Disabilities
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016-12
- Volume
- 59
- Pages
- 294-305
- ISSN
- 0891-4222 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2521551845
- Cited by
- 12
- References
- 40
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2
- FWCI
- 1.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Research in Developmental Disabilities (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Down syndrome and intellectual disability research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
- Social Sciences › Education › Inclusion and Disability in Education and Sport
- Keywords
- intellectual disability, aggression, direct care workers, employee attitudes, team climate, psychiatric diagnosis, client characteristics, staff characteristics, gender differences
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aggression, Allied Health Personnel, Attitude of Health Personnel, Female, Humans, Male, Intellectual Disability, Middle Aged, Netherlands, Patient Care Team, Professional-Patient Relations, Organizational Culture, Multilevel Analysis, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review