Cited by 37Language Development and DisordersChild and Animal Learning DevelopmentDevelopmental and Educational Neuropsychology

Prediction and persistence of late talking: A study of Italian toddlers at 29 and 34 months

Bello, Arianna, Onofrio, Daniela, Remi, Lorena, Caselli, Cristina·2018·Research in Developmental Disabilities

Abstract

This study analyzed the communicative, linguistic and symbolic skills in Italian Late Talking (LT) toddlers. Thirty-five participants were identified through a language-screening program at 29 months by using the Italian version of MB-CDI W&S Short Form. Cognitive, communicative and linguistic skills were evaluated 5 later, with indirect and direct tools. The MB-CDI WS Short Form revealed, in LT children, weakness in gesture production, decontextualized comprehension, verbal imitation, symbolic play, and phonological accuracy. Our results confirmed lexical size at 29 months is the predictive factor to identify language delay at 34 months. The clinical assessment at 34 months confirmed that 89% of the LT children had a vocabulary size below the 10th percentile on the MB-CDI Complete Form. On a structured task, LT children showed lexical comprehension more preserved than lexical production, and more advanced skills in nouns than in predicates. Weakness in socioconversational abilities emerged. Correlation among maternal education, expressive vocabulary and socio-conversational competence in LT children was evidenced. Strong association among cognitive, communicative and linguistic skills were documented.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ridd.2018.02.006

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 52 · Cited by 37

Authors
Bello, A., Onofrio, D., Remi, L., & Caselli, C.
Affiliations
  • Roma Tre University (IT)
  • National Research Council (IT)
Corresponding author
Bello, Arianna
Venue
Research in Developmental Disabilities
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-04
Volume
75
Pages
40-48
ISSN
0891-4222 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2791178288
Cited by
37
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 6
FWCI
7.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Research in Developmental Disabilities (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Iris (Roma Tre University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
Keywords
late talking, language delay, toddlers, vocabulary size, word comprehension, word production, pretend play, gesture production, phonological accuracy, verbal imitation, predictive factors, language screening, Italian children, maternal education
MeSH terms
Child, Preschool, Cognition, Communication, Female, Gestures, Humans, Italy, Language Development Disorders, Male, Mass Screening, Phonetics, Vocabulary, Comprehension

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review