Cited by 16Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderDevelopmental and Educational NeuropsychologyCognitive Abilities and Testing

The structure, profile, and diagnostic significance of intelligence in children with ADHD are impressively similar to those of children with a specific learning disorder.

Toffalini, Enrico, Buono, Serafino, Cornoldi, Cesare·2022·Research in Developmental Disabilities

Abstract

This study examines the structure, profile, and diagnostic significance of intelligence in a group of 948 children diagnosed with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) assessed with the WISC-IV and compared with children with specific learning disorders (SLDs) and with typically developing children. Based on four indexes, the WISC-IV configuration found in TD resulted applicable to ADHD, but with generally lower loadings on g. The Perceptual Reasoning and Verbal Comprehension indexes not only had higher loadings compared to the other two indexes but also represented the relative strengths of children with ADHD, as previously observed for children with SLD. In fact, the WISC pattern could be successfully used for discriminating between ADHD and TD, but not between ADHD and SLD. The latter result was not due to a co-occurrence of a learning disorder because the presence or absence of an associated diagnosis of SLD negligibly affected the pattern observed in ADHD. We concluded that the characteristics of intelligence in children with ADHD can be relevant for assessing this disorder, and that ADHD and SLDs share largely similar underlying cognitive features.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ridd.2022.104306

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Scores on the Verbal Comprehension Index (VCI) and Perceptual Reasoning Index (PRI) generally remain within typical ranges in ADHD.

    “In contrast, scores on the Verbal Comprehension Index (VCI) and the Perceptual Reasoning Index (PRI), indicators of conceptual reasoning and efficiency in visuospatial processing, generally remain within typical ranges [21, 27, 28, 29].”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 51 · Cited by 16

Authors
Toffalini, E., Buono, S., & Cornoldi, C.
Affiliations
  • University of Padua (IT)
  • I.R.C.C.S. Oasi Maria SS (IT)
Corresponding author
  • Toffalini, Enrico
  • Cornoldi, Cesare
Venue
Research in Developmental Disabilities
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-10
Volume
129
Pages
104306
ISSN
0891-4222 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4285792172
Cited by
16
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3
FWCI
1.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Research in Developmental Disabilities (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Padua Research Archive (University of Padova) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
Keywords
attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, specific learning disorders, intelligence structure, WISC-IV, cognitive profile, perceptual reasoning, verbal comprehension, general intelligence factor, diagnostic validity, children
MeSH terms
Specific Learning Disorder, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Child, Humans, Intelligence, Learning Disabilities, Wechsler Scales

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review