The structure, profile, and diagnostic significance of intelligence in children with ADHD are impressively similar to those of children with a specific learning disorder.
Abstract
This study examines the structure, profile, and diagnostic significance of intelligence in a group of 948 children diagnosed with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) assessed with the WISC-IV and compared with children with specific learning disorders (SLDs) and with typically developing children. Based on four indexes, the WISC-IV configuration found in TD resulted applicable to ADHD, but with generally lower loadings on g. The Perceptual Reasoning and Verbal Comprehension indexes not only had higher loadings compared to the other two indexes but also represented the relative strengths of children with ADHD, as previously observed for children with SLD. In fact, the WISC pattern could be successfully used for discriminating between ADHD and TD, but not between ADHD and SLD. The latter result was not due to a co-occurrence of a learning disorder because the presence or absence of an associated diagnosis of SLD negligibly affected the pattern observed in ADHD. We concluded that the characteristics of intelligence in children with ADHD can be relevant for assessing this disorder, and that ADHD and SLDs share largely similar underlying cognitive features.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Scores on the Verbal Comprehension Index (VCI) and Perceptual Reasoning Index (PRI) generally remain within typical ranges in ADHD.
“In contrast, scores on the Verbal Comprehension Index (VCI) and the Perceptual Reasoning Index (PRI), indicators of conceptual reasoning and efficiency in visuospatial processing, generally remain within typical ranges [21, 27, 28, 29].”
From ADHD, Subtypes and Cognitive Performance: WISC-V as a Support Tool for Diagnostic Assessment (2026) · cites this paper as [28]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 51 · Cited by 16
- Authors
- Toffalini, E., Buono, S., & Cornoldi, C.
- Affiliations
- University of Padua (IT)
- I.R.C.C.S. Oasi Maria SS (IT)
- Corresponding author
- Toffalini, Enrico
- Cornoldi, Cesare
- Venue
- Research in Developmental Disabilities
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2022-10
- Volume
- 129
- Pages
- 104306
- ISSN
- 0891-4222 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4285792172
- Cited by
- 16
- References
- 51
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3
- FWCI
- 1.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Research in Developmental Disabilities (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Padua Research Archive (University of Padova) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
- Keywords
- attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, specific learning disorders, intelligence structure, WISC-IV, cognitive profile, perceptual reasoning, verbal comprehension, general intelligence factor, diagnostic validity, children
- MeSH terms
- Specific Learning Disorder, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Child, Humans, Intelligence, Learning Disabilities, Wechsler Scales
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review