Cited by 3Discourse Analysis in Language StudiesComputational and Text Analysis MethodsLinguistics and Discourse Analysis

LLM-assisted genre analysis: The effect of sampling temperature on reliability

Open access
Grullon-Polanco, Larry·2026·Research Methods in Applied Linguistics

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.rmal.2026.100314

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Grullon-Polanco, L.
Venue
Research Methods in Applied Linguistics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2026-08
Volume
5
Issue
2
Pages
100314
ISSN
2772-7661 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W7140094363
Cited by
3
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 3
FWCI
67.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Research Methods in Applied Linguistics (publishedVersion)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
  • Social Sciences › General Social Sciences › Computational and Text Analysis Methods
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Linguistics and Discourse Analysis
Keywords
large language models, genre analysis, sampling temperature, reliability statistics, LLM-assisted annotation, text classification

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review