Cited by 27Obstructive Sleep Apnea ResearchTemporomandibular Joint DisordersSleep and related disorders

Clinical co-morbidities in obstructive sleep apnea syndrome treated with mandibular repositioning appliance

Open access
Machado, Marco Antonio Cardoso, de Carvalho, Luciane Bizari Coin, Juliano, Maria Ligia, Taga, Marcel, do Prado, Lucila Bizari Fernandes, do Prado, Gilmar Fernandes·2006·Respiratory Medicine

Abstract

Introduction Intraoral mandibular repositioner appliances (IOMRAs) are designed to enlarge pharyngeal airway space advancing the mandible and increasing genioglossus tone during sleep. Obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) treatment with IOMRAs is beneficial, but there is a lack of studies in the literature defining the target population more inclined to respond to this treatment.Methods We contacted by telephone 188 previously treated patients with IOMRA, detecting 20 not improved patients (Study Group). Twenty improved patients of the remaining 168 were randomly paired according to gender, age, apnea, and hypopnea index as Control Group. Both groups answered questionnaires for diagnosis of sleep disorders, depression, anxiety, and the Epworth sleepiness scale. We did a descriptive and inferential statistical analysis. The inferential analysis was divided into two steps: univariate analysis using Fischer exact test and a multiple inferential analysis using a stepwise regression model.Results Although the final model included only insomnia, we concluded that the presence of gastric, neurological and rheumatic diseases also tended to be associated with the self-perception of non-improvement. The association between the accumulation of gastric, neurological, and rheumatic diseases and insomnia and improvement demonstrated that an increase in one of these diseases correspond to a two-fold increase in the chance of non-improvement.Conclusions Insomnia was the most important factor compromising the success of OSAS treatment with IOMRAs, and the isolated presence of gastric, neurological and rheumatic diseases, but especially their combination, reduces the perception rate of well-succeeded treatment with IOMRAs.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.rmed.2005.10.002

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A small number of studies have investigated the effect of oral appliance devices, upper airway surgery, and nasal dilator strip therapy in the treatment of COMISA patients.

    “A small number of studies have investigated the effect of oral appliance devices, upper airway surgery, and nasal dilator strip therapy in the treatment of COMISA patients [75,80].”

    From Co-morbid insomnia and sleep apnea (COMISA): Prevalence, consequences, methodological considerations, and recent randomized controlled trials (2019) · cites this paper as [80]

    The Results (page unavailable) examine how insomnia relates to clinical improvement after oral-appliance treatment for obstructive sleep apnea, supporting the oral-appliance component of the COMISA claim. This paper does not investigate upper-airway surgery or nasal dilator strips, or establish how many studies have investigated these treatments. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 25 · Cited by 27

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Gorenstein C, Andrade L. Inventa ´rio de depressa ˜o de Beck: propriedades psicome ´tricas da versa ˜o em portugue ˆs. Rev Psiquiatr Clin 1998;25:245-50.
  2. Agresti A. Categorial data analysis. New York: Wiley; 1990. p. 558.

Authors
Machado, M. A. C., de Carvalho, L. B. C., Juliano, M. L., Taga, M., do Prado, L. B. F., & do Prado, G. F.
Affiliations
Universidade Federal de São Paulo (BR)
Venue
Respiratory Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-06
Volume
100
Issue
6
Pages
988-995
ISSN
0954-6111 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2163254784
Cited by
27
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 4
FWCI
0.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Respiratory Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Americanae (AECID Library) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Complementary and Manual Therapy › Temporomandibular Joint Disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
Keywords
obstructive sleep apnea, mandibular advancement device, comorbidities, insomnia, gastric diseases, neurological disorders, rheumatic diseases, treatment response, Epworth Sleepiness Scale, anxiety and depression
MeSH terms
Activator Appliances, Adult, Aged, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Nervous System Diseases, Regression Analysis, Rheumatic Diseases, Stomach Diseases, Case-Control Studies, Treatment Outcome, Polysomnography, Sleep Apnea, Obstructive

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review