Cited by 131Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) ResearchDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchCancer-related cognitive impairment studies

Cognitive dysfunction in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease – A systematic review

Open access
Schou, Lone, Østergaard, Birte, Rasmussen, Lars S., Rydahl-Hansen, Susan, Phanareth, Klaus·2012·Respiratory Medicine

Abstract

Background Substantial healthcare resources are spent on chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). In addition, the involvement of patients in monitoring and treatment of their condition has been suggested. However, it is important to maintain a view of self-care that takes differences in cognitive ability into account. The aim of this study was to determine the occurrence and severity of cognitive dysfunction in COPD patients, and to assess the association between severity of COPD and the level of cognitive function.Methods We conducted a systematic review, and a search in the following databases: Medline, PsychINFO, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, CINAHL, and SweMed up to July 2010. The articles were included if participants were patients with COPD, relevant outcome was cognitive function investigated by a neuropsychological test battery, and the severity of COPD had been assessed.Results Fifteen studies were included, involving 655 COPD patients and 394 controls. Cognitive function was impaired in COPD patients as compared to healthy controls, but the level of functioning was better than in patients with Alzheimer's disease. There was a significant association between severity of COPD, as measured by lung function and blood gases, and cognitive dysfunction, but only in patients with severe COPD.Conclusions Cognitive impairment can be detected in severe COPD patients, but the clinical relevance of the cognitive dysfunction is not yet known. Future studies should concentrate on the consequences of cognitive dysfunction for daily living in these patients, and solutions involving a high degree of self-care might require special support.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.rmed.2012.03.013

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 43 · Cited by 131

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Lezak MD, Howieson DB, Loring DW. Neuropsychological assessment. 4th. ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2004.
  2. American Thoracic Society. Standards for the diagnosis and care of patients with chronical obstrucyive pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1995;152:77e120.
  3. Higgins JPT, Green S. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. The Cochrane Collaboration & John Wiley & Sons Ltd; 2008.
  4. Fix AJ, Golden CJ, Daughton D, Kass I, Bell CW. Neuro- psychological deficits among patients with chronic obstruc- tive pulmonary disease. Int J Neurosci 1982 Mar;16(2): 99e105.
  5. Orth M, Kotterba S, Duchna K, Widdig W, Rasche K, Schultze- Werninghaus G, et al. Cognitive deficits in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Pneumologie 2006 Oct;60(10):593e9.

Authors
Schou, L., Østergaard, B., Rasmussen, L. S., Rydahl-Hansen, S., & Phanareth, K.
Affiliations
  • Frederiksberg Hospital (DK)
  • University of Southern Denmark (DK)
  • Copenhagen University Hospital (DK)
Corresponding author
Schou, Lone
Venue
Respiratory Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-08
Volume
106
Issue
8
Pages
1071-1081
ISSN
0954-6111 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2102630206
Cited by
131
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Respiratory Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (publishedVersion)
  • University of Southern Denmark Research Portal (University of Southern Denmark) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • The Tryg Foundation
  • The Health Insurance Foundation
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Cancer-related cognitive impairment studies
Keywords
chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, cognitive impairment, COPD severity, lung function, blood gases, self-care, neuropsychological assessment, Alzheimer's disease comparison
MeSH terms
Activities of Daily Living, Cognition Disorders, Humans, Neuropsychological Tests, Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review