Walking exercise response to bronchodilation in mild COPD: A randomized trial
Open accessAbstract
Rationale Patients with mild chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) present abnormal ventilatory mechanics during exercise and may require bronchodilator therapy. However, bronchodilation does not enhance cycling exercise tolerance in these patients whereas walking may be more sensitive to the effects of bronchodilation. Objectives To characterize the impact of bronchodilation on i) exercise tolerance ii) cardiopulmonary response and iii) dynamic hyperinflation following an endurance shuttle walking test in patients with mild COPD. Methods In a randomized double-blind cross-over trial, 37 patients with GOLD stage I COPD (FEV(1), 96 ± 2% predicted, mean ± SEM) completed an endurance shuttle walking test up to exhaustion 90 ± 15 min following nebulization of a placebo [NaCl] or of ipratropium bromide/salbutamol sulfate (500 μg/2.5 mg) combination. Results FEV(1) significantly increased following bronchodilation compared with placebo (0.17 ± 0.02 vs. -0.02 ± 0.01 L, p < 0.0001, mean ± SEM). The difference in walking endurance time between bronchodilation and placebo was not statistically significant (Δ15 ± 12 s, p = 0.21), with the upper and lower boundaries of the 95% confidence interval [-9-40 s, 95% CI] within the proposed minimally important difference for this variable (65 s). The ratio of breathing frequency to tidal volume tended to be decreased with bronchodilation during exercise (p = 0.07), indicating a deeper and slower breathing pattern with bronchodilation. Bronchodilation had a significant effect on dynamic hyperinflation at isotime and at peak exercise. Conclusion Bronchodilation did not improve walking endurance in patients with mild COPD despite small physiological benefits of uncertain clinical relevance.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Dynamic hyperinflation also occurs in many patients with mild COPD, independently of the presence of resting hyperinflation.
“Dynamic hyperinflation is highly prevalent in the advanced stages of COPD, and new evidence suggests that it also occurs in many patients with mild disease, independently of the presence of resting hyperinflation.”
From Pathogenesis of hyperinflation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (2014) · cites this paper as [24]
During exercise, dynamic hyperinflation is already present in patients with mild disease (GOLD stage 1), even when resting hyperinflation is slightly present or absent.
“During exercise, some studies report that dynamic hyperinflation is already present in patients with mild disease (GOLD stage 1), even when resting hyperinflation is slightly present22,23 or absent.24,41–43”
From Pathogenesis of hyperinflation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (2014) · cites this paper as [24]
At peak exercise, notwithstanding the severity of the disease, patients with COPD show a consistent fall of approximately 20% of their resting IC at peak exercise.
“At peak exercise, notwithstanding the severity of the disease, patients seem to show a consistent fall of approximately 20% of their resting IC at peak exercise.22–24,45–48”
From Pathogenesis of hyperinflation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (2014) · cites this paper as [24]
Cites
O'Donnell, D. E., Voduc, N., Fitzpatrick, M., & Webb, K. A. (2004) · European Respiratory Journal · doi:10.1183/09031936.04.00072703 · Cited by 365 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Pathogenesis of hyperinflation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Saey, Gagnon, P., Guenette, J., Langer, D., Laviolette, L., Mainguy, V., Maltais, F., & Ribeiro, F. (2014) · International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease · doi:10.2147/copd.s38934 · Cited by 180 · see citing works
“21 Finally, this phenomenon can also occur in patients with mild disease, 22–24 a category of individuals likely representing a great portion of patients diagnosed with COPD.”
Self-citation
- Authors
- Gagnon, P., Saey, D., Provencher, S., Milot, J., Bourbeau, J., Tan, W. C., Martel, S., & Maltais, F.
- Affiliations
- Institut universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de Québec (CA)
- Montreal Chest Institute (CA)
- University of British Columbia (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Gagnon, Philippe
- Saey, Didier
- Provencher, Steeve
- Milot, Julie
- Bourbeau, Jean
- Tan, Wan C.
- Martel, Simon
- Maltais, François
- Venue
- Respiratory Medicine
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012-12
- Volume
- 106
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1695-1705
- ISSN
- 0954-6111 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2080914292
- Cited by
- 21
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 2
- FWCI
- 2.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Respiratory Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Pfizer
- Pfizer Canada
- Canadian Institutes of Health Research (93326)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Asthma and respiratory diseases
- Keywords
- bronchodilation, ipratropium bromide, salbutamol, walking endurance, exercise tolerance, dynamic hyperinflation, respiratory mechanics, breathing pattern, shuttle walking test
- MeSH terms
- Administration, Inhalation, Aged, Albuterol, Analysis of Variance, Bronchodilator Agents, Double-Blind Method, Drug Therapy, Combination, Exercise Test, Female, Humans, Male, Ipratropium, Oxygen Consumption, Respiratory Function Tests, Walking, Exercise Tolerance, Cross-Over Studies, Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive, Quadriceps Muscle
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review