Cited by 50Antimicrobial Resistance in StaphylococcusPneumonia and Respiratory InfectionsNosocomial Infections in ICU

Risk factors for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in patients with community-onset and hospital-onset pneumonia

Open access
Wooten, D.A., Winston, L.G.·2013·Respiratory Medicine

Abstract

Objectives The risk factors for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) pneumonia have not been fully characterized and are likely to be different depending on whether infection is acquired in the community or the hospital.Methods We conducted a case-control study of 619 adults hospitalized between 2005 and 2010 with either MRSA or methicillin-sensitive S. aureus (MSSA) pneumonia. Patients with a respiratory culture within 48 h of hospitalization had community-onset pneumonia whereas patients with a culture collected after this time point had hospital-onset pneumonia.Results Among patients with community-onset disease, the risk for MRSA was increased by tobacco use (OR 2.31, CI 1.23-4.31), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (OR 3.76, CI 1.74-8.08), and recent antibiotic exposure (OR 4.87, CI 2.35-10.1) in multivariate analysis while patients with hospital-onset disease had an increased MRSA risk with tobacco use (OR 2.66, CI 1.38-5.14), illicit drug use (OR 3.52, CI 2.21-5.59), and recent antibiotic exposure (OR 2.04, CI 3.54-13.01). Hospitalization within the prior three months was associated with decreased risk (OR 0.64, CI 0.46-0.89) in multivariate analysis.Conclusions This study suggests there are common and distinct risk factors for MRSA pneumonia based on location of onset. The decreased risk for MRSA pneumonia associated with recent hospitalization is unexpected and warrants further investigation.Summary This case-control study showed that there are common and distinct risk factors associated with MRSA pneumonia depending on whether the infection onset is in the hospital or in the community. Recent hospitalization was unexpectedly shown to be associated with decreased risk for MRSA pneumonia and warrants further investigation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.rmed.2013.05.006

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Patient-related risk factors for MRSA include prior MRSA infection or colonisation, recent IV antibiotics, recurrent skin infections or chronic wounds, invasive devices, haemodialysis, recent hospital admissions, and severity of illness.

    “Patient-related risk factors for MRSA include prior history of MRSA infection or colonisation, recent IV antibiotics, history of recurrent skin infections or chronic wounds, presence of invasive devices, haemodialysis, recent hospital admissions and severity of illness [136, 138–142].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 27 · Cited by 50

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Brumfitt W, Hamilton-Miller J. Methicillin-resistant Staphylo- coccus aureus. N Engl J Med May 4 1989;320(18):1188e96.
  2. Naimi TS, LeDell KH, Como-Sabetti K, et al. Comparison of community-and health care-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection. JAMA Dec 10 2003;290(22): 2976e84.
  3. Neofytos D, Kuhn B, Shen S, Hua Zhu X, Jungkind D, Flomenberg P. Emergence of staphylococcal cassette chromo- some mec type IV methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus as a cause of ventilator-associated pneumonia. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol Oct 2007;28(10):1206e9.
  4. Athanassa Z, Siempos II , Falagas ME. Impact of methicillin resistance on mortality in Staphylococcus aureus VAP: a sys- tematic review. Eur Respir J Mar 2008;31(3):625e32.
  5. Torres A, Elebiary M, Martinez C, Hernandez C. Invasive pro- cedures available for diagnosing ventilator-associated pneu- monia. Intensive Care World Jun 1993;10(2):91e5.

Authors
Wooten, D. A., & Winston, L. G.
Affiliations
University of California, San Francisco (US)
Corresponding author
  • Wooten, D.A.
  • Winston, L.G.
Venue
Respiratory Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-08
Volume
107
Issue
8
Pages
1266-1270
ISSN
0954-6111 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2168878700
Cited by
50
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 1
FWCI
3.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Respiratory Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
UCSF Clinical and Translational Science Institute
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Pneumonia and Respiratory Infections
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine › Nosocomial Infections in ICU
Keywords
methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, MRSA pneumonia, community-onset pneumonia, risk factors, tobacco use, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, illicit drug use, recent hospitalization, methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus
MeSH terms
Anti-Bacterial Agents, Cross Infection, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Pneumonia, Staphylococcal, Retrospective Studies, Risk Factors, San Francisco, Case-Control Studies, Community-Acquired Infections, Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review