Cited by 60Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic DisordersRespiratory and Cough-Related ResearchPathogenesis and Treatment of Hiccups

Cough syncope

Open access
Dicpinigaitis, Peter V., Lim, Leonard, Farmakidis, Constantine·2014·Respiratory Medicine

Abstract

Loss of consciousness following cough was first described in 1876 as "laryngeal vertigo" Since then, several hundred cases of what is now most commonly termed cough syncope have been reported, often in association with various medical conditions. Some early authors assumed this entity to be a form of epilepsy, but by the mid-20th century, general consensus reflected that post-tussive syncope was a consequence of markedly elevated intrathoracic pressures induced by coughing. A typical profile of the cough syncope patient emerging from the literature is that of a middle-aged, large-framed or overweight male with obstructive airways disease. Presumably, such an individual would be more likely to generate the extremely high intrathoracic pressures associated with cough-induced fainting. The precise mechanism of cough syncope remains a matter of debate. Theories proposed include various consequences of the marked elevation of intrathoracic pressures induced by coughing: diminished cardiac output causing decreased systemic blood pressure and, consequently, cerebral hypoperfusion; increased cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) pressure causing increased extravascular pressure around cranial vessels, resulting in diminished brain perfusion; or, a cerebral concussion-like effect from a rapid rise in CSF pressure. More recent mechanistic studies suggest a neurally mediated reflex vasodepressor-bradycardia response to cough. Since loss of consciousness is a direct and immediate result of cough, elimination of cough will eliminate the resultant syncopal episodes. Thus, the approach to the patient with cough syncope requires thorough evaluation and treatment of potential underlying causes of cough, as summarized in several recently published cough management guidelines.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.rmed.2013.10.020

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dicpinigaitis, P. V., Lim, L., & Farmakidis, C.
Affiliations
Albert Einstein College of Medicine (US)
Corresponding author
Dicpinigaitis, Peter V.
Venue
Respiratory Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-02
Volume
108
Issue
2
Pages
244-251
ISSN
0954-6111 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4244903974
Cited by
60
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 4
FWCI
0.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Respiratory Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Respiratory and Cough-Related Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Pathogenesis and Treatment of Hiccups
Keywords
cough syncope, intrathoracic pressure, obstructive airway disease, cerebrospinal fluid pressure, cerebral hypoperfusion, cough management
MeSH terms
Acute Disease, Chronic Disease, Cough, Female, Humans, Male, Syncope

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review