A Fault Tolerant Architecture for Data Fusion: A Real Application of Kalman Filters for Mobile Robot Localization
Open accessIntegrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 32 · Cited by 68
- Authors
- Bader, K., Lussier, B., & Schön, W.
- Affiliations
- Université de Technologie de Compiègne (FR)
- Corresponding author
- Bader, Kaci
- ORCID
- Lussier, Benjamin
- Venue
- Robotics and Autonomous Systems
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-02
- Volume
- 88
- Pages
- 11-23
- ISSN
- 0921-8890 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2551817335
- Cited by
- 68
- References
- 32
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3
- FWCI
- 5.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hal.science
- Licence
- Locations
- Robotics and Autonomous Systems (publishedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- French National Research Agency (ANR-11-IDEX-0004-02, ANR-10-44 EQPX)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Distributed systems and fault tolerance
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Target Tracking and Data Fusion in Sensor Networks
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Fault Detection and Control Systems
- Keywords
- fault tolerance, sensor fusion, Kalman filter, mobile robot localization, fault detection, fault recovery, dependability, fault injection
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
