Cited by 106Autonomous Vehicle Technology and SafetyReinforcement Learning in RoboticsTraffic control and management

Combining reinforcement learning with rule-based controllers for transparent and general decision-making in autonomous driving

Likmeta, Amarildo, Metelli, Alberto Maria, Tirinzoni, Andrea, Giol, Riccardo, Restelli, Marcello, Romano, Danilo·2020·Robotics and Autonomous Systems

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.robot.2020.103568

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • When AI systems help us in areas such as hiring, financial risk assessment, and face identification, systematic unfairness in their decisions might have negative social ramifications.

    “When AI systems help us in areas such as hiring, financial risk assessment, and face identification, systematic unfairness in their decisions might have negative social ramifications (e.g., underprivileged groups might experience systematic disadvantage in hiring decisions [48], or be disproportionally impacted in criminal risk profiling [104, 161, 146]).”

    From Trustworthy AI: From Principles to Practices (2023) · cites this paper as [48]

  • Many current AI systems are biased against underrepresented groups.

    “many current AI systems are found vulnerable to imperceptible attacks, biased against underrepresented groups, lacking in user privacy protection.”

    From Trustworthy AI: From Principles to Practices (2023) · cites this paper as [48]

  • DNN's lack of explainability places a demand to require explicit explanations or impose rules to ensure that the vehicle is behaving in a regulated manner.

    “At the algorithm level, though DNN has achieved impressive performance in autonomous driving tasks like perception and planning, its lack of explainability still places a demand to require explicit explanations or impose rules to ensure that the vehicle is behaving in a regulated manner [96, 48].”

    From Trustworthy AI: From Principles to Practices (2023) · cites this paper as [48]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Likmeta, A., Metelli, A. M., Tirinzoni, A., Giol, R., Restelli, M., & Romano, D.
Affiliations
Politecnico di Milano (IT)
Corresponding author
Likmeta, Amarildo
Venue
Robotics and Autonomous Systems
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-09
Volume
131
Pages
103568
ISSN
0921-8890 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3037429136
Cited by
106
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 8
FWCI
4.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Robotics and Autonomous Systems (publishedVersion)
  • Archivio istituzionale della ricerca (Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna) (submittedVersion)
  • Virtual Community of Pathological Anatomy (University of Castilla La Mancha) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Traffic control and management
Keywords
autonomous driving, high-level decision making, reinforcement learning, rule-based controller, explainable decision-making, transparency, robustness, highway driving, intersection driving, urban driving conditions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review