Cited by 45Advanced Neural Network ApplicationsAutonomous Vehicle Technology and SafetyVideo Surveillance and Tracking Methods

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Comparative analysis of multiple YOLO-based target detectors and trackers for ADAS in edge devices

Open access
Azevedo, Pedro, Santos, Vítor·2024·Robotics and Autonomous Systems

Abstract

Accurate detection and tracking of vulnerable road users and traffic objects represent vital tasks for autonomous driving and driving assistance systems. The recent developments in the field rely heavily on deep learning techniques, which require large computational resources. Thus, optimizing software components alongside appropriate hardware choices is imperative for the development of a system that can perform real-time inference. In this paper, we propose a solution for object detection and tracking in an autonomous driving scenario. Specifically, we compare and explore the applicability of various state-of-the-art object detectors trained on the BDD100K dataset, including YOLOv8, YOLOv7, YOLOv5, Scaled-YOLOv4, and YOLOR. Moreover, we investigate the deployment of these algorithms on edge devices, such as the NVIDIA Jetson AGX Xavier. Additionally, we assess the effectiveness of DeepStream technology for real-time inference, comparing different object trackers, such as NvDCF and DeepSORT, using the KITTI tracking dataset. The suggested approach entails utilizing a YOLOR-CSP architecture in conjunction with a DeepSORT tracker, to achieve a real-time inference rate of 33.3 frames per second (FPS) with a detection interval of one, and a 17 FPS rate with an interval of zero.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.robot.2023.104558

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Baradaran Khalkhali, 2020, Vehicle tracking with Kalman filter using online situation assessment, Robot. Auton. Syst., 131, 10.1016/j.robot.2020.103596 · DOI
  2. C.-Y. Wang, A. Bochkovskiy, H.-Y.M. Liao, Scaled-YOLOv4: Scaling Cross Stage Partial Network, in: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, CVPR, 2021, pp. 13029–13038. · DOI
  3. Luiten, 2020, HOTA: A higher order metric for evaluating multi-object tracking, Int. J. Comput. Vis., 129, 548, 10.1007/s11263-020-01375-2 · DOI
  4. Wu, 2022, YOLOP: You only look once for panoptic driving perception, Mach. Intell. Res., 19, 550, 10.1007/s11633-022-1339-y · DOI · Paper page

Metadata

Authors
Azevedo, P., & Santos, V.
Affiliations
University of Aveiro (PT)
Corresponding author
Azevedo, Pedro
Venue
Robotics and Autonomous Systems
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-01
Volume
171
Pages
104558
ISSN
0921-8890 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4387582095
Cited by
45
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 16
FWCI
4.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Robotics and Autonomous Systems (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Video Surveillance and Tracking Methods
Keywords
YOLO, object detection, object tracking, vulnerable road users, autonomous driving, driver assistance systems, edge devices, NVIDIA Jetson AGX Xavier, DeepSORT, BDD100K, real-time inference, YOLOv8, YOLOv7, YOLOv5, YOLOv4

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review