The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Scaling Gross Primary Production (GPP) over boreal and deciduous forest landscapes in support of MODIS GPP product validation
Open accessAbstract
The Moderate Resolution Imaging Radiometer (MODIS) is the primary instrument in the NASA Earth Observing System for monitoring the seasonality of global terrestrial vegetation. Estimates of 8-day mean daily gross primary production (GPP) at the 1 km spatial resolution are now operationally produced by the MODIS Land Science Team for the global terrestrial surface using a production efficiency approach. In this study, the 2001 MODIS GPP product was compared with scaled GPP estimates (25 km 2 ) based on ground measurements at two forested sites. The ground-based GPP scaling approach relied on a carbon cycle process model run in a spatially distributed mode. Land cover classification and maximum annual leaf area index, as derived from Landsat ETM+ imagery, were used in model initiation. The model was driven by daily meteorological observations from an eddy covariance flux tower situated at the center of each site. Model simulated GPPs were corroborated with daily GPP estimates from the flux tower. At the hardwood forest site, the MODIS GPP phenology started earlier than was indicated by the scaled GPP, and the summertime GPP from MODIS was generally lower than the scaled GPP values. The fall-off in production at the end of the growing season was similar to the validation data. At the boreal forest site, the GPP phenologies generally agreed because both responded to the strong signal associated with minimum temperature. The midsummer MODIS GPP there was generally higher than the ground-based GPP. The differences between the MODIS GPP products and the ground-based GPPs were driven by differences in the timing of FPAR and the magnitude of light use efficiency as well as by differences in other inputs to the MODIS GPP algorithm—daily incident PAR, minimum temperature, and vapor pressure deficit. Ground-based scaling of GPP has the potential to improve the parameterization of light use efficiency in satellite-based GPP monitoring algorithms.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The McCree-de Wit-Penning de Vries-Thornley respiration paradigms: 30 years later.
Amthor, J. (2000) · Annals of Botany · doi:10.1006/anbo.2000.1175 · Cited by 822 · cited 1×
“However, the ratio of NPP to GPP is not constant across plant functional types (Amthor, 2000) and scaling Ra from air temperature and chamber measurements (e.g. Law, Ryan, & Anthoni, 1999) is a complex undertaking.”
Background
Cited by
Leuning, R., Cleugh, H. A., Zegelin, S. J., & Hughes, D. (2005) · Agricultural and Forest Meteorology · doi:10.1016/j.agrformet.2004.12.004 · Cited by 371
Metadata
- Authors
- Turner, D. P., Ritts, W. D., Cohen, W. B., Gower, S. T., Zhao, M., Running, S. W., Wofsy, S. C., Urbanski, S., Dunn, A. L., & Munger, J. W.
- Venue
- Remote Sensing of Environment
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2003-12
- Volume
- 88
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 256-270
- ISSN
- 0034-4257 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2126493480
- Cited by
- 328
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 16.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Scaling Gross Primary Production (GPP) over boreal and deciduous forest landscapes in support of MODIS GPP product validation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.rse.2003.06.005
- The paper
- Turner, D. P., Ritts, W. D., Cohen, W. B., Gower, S. T., Zhao, M., Running, S. W., Wofsy, S. C., Urbanski, S., Dunn, A. L., & Munger, J. W. (2003). Scaling Gross Primary Production (GPP) over boreal and deciduous forest landscapes in support of MODIS GPP product validation. Remote Sensing of Environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2003.06.005
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.