The DOI matches its Crossref record; 37 of the 37 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Land cover mapping of large areas using chain classification of neighboring Landsat satellite images
Open accessAbstract
Satellite imagery is the major data source for regional to global land cover maps. However, land cover mapping of large areas with medium-resolution imagery is costly and often constrained by the lack of good training and validation data. Our goal was to overcome these limitations, and to test chain classifications, i.e., the classification of Landsat images based on the information in the overlapping areas of neighboring scenes. The basic idea was to classify one Landsat scene first where good ground truth data is available, and then to classify the neighboring Landsat scene using the land cover classification of the first scene in the overlap area as training data. We tested chain classification for a forest/non-forest classification in the Carpathian Mountains on one horizontal chain of six Landsat scenes, and two vertical chains of two Landsat scenes each. We collected extensive training data from Quickbird imagery for classifying radiometrically uncorrected data with Support Vector Machines (SVMs). The SVMs classified 8 scenes with overall accuracies between 92.1% and 98.9% (average of 96.3%). Accuracy loss when automatically classifying neighboring scenes with chain classification was 1.9% on average. Even a chain of six images resulted only in an accuracy loss of 5.1% for the last image compared to a reference classification from independent training data for the last image. Chain classification thus performed well, but we note that chain classification can only be applied when land cover classes are well represented in the overlap area of neighboring Landsat scenes. As long as this constraint is met though, chain classification is a powerful approach for large area land cover classifications, especially in areas of varying training data availability.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cortes, C., & Vapnik, V. (1995) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1007/bf00994018 · Cited by 59,421
LIBSVM: A library for support vector machines
Chang, C.-C., & Lin, C.-J. (2011) · ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology · doi:10.1145/1961189.1961199 · Cited by 40,918
The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory
Vapnik, V. N. (1995) · doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-2440-0 · Cited by 39,138
A Tutorial on Support Vector Machines for Pattern Recognition
Burges, C. J. C. (1998) · Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery · doi:10.1023/a:1009715923555 · Cited by 16,429
An Introduction to Support Vector Machines and Other Kernel-based Learning Methods
Cristianini, N., & Shawe-Taylor, J. (2000) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511801389 · Cited by 13,855
A training algorithm for optimal margin classifiers
Boser, B. E., Guyon, I. M., & Vapnik, V. N. (1992) · Proceedings of the fifth annual workshop on Computational learning theory · doi:10.1145/130385.130401 · Cited by 11,992
Libsvm : A library for support vector machines
Ferrari, V. (2008) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 10,122
A review of assessing the accuracy of classifications of remotely sensed data
Congalton, R. G. (1991) · Remote Sensing of Environment · doi:10.1016/0034-4257(91)90048-b · Cited by 7,724
An overview of statistical learning theory
Vapnik, V. N. (1999) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks · doi:10.1109/72.788640 · Cited by 6,266
Status of land cover classification accuracy assessment
Foody, G. M. (2002) · Remote Sensing of Environment · doi:10.1016/s0034-4257(01)00295-4 · Cited by 4,580
Cited by
Support vector machines in remote sensing: a review
Mountrakis, G., Im, J., & Ogole, C. (2011) · ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2010.11.001 · Cited by 3,473
Patterns and drivers of post-socialist farmland abandonment in Western Ukraine
Baumann, M., Kuemmerle, T., Elbakidze, M., Ozdogan, M., Radeloff, V. C., Keuler, N. S., Prishchepov, A. V., Kruhlov, I., & Hostert, P. (2011) · Land Use Policy · doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2010.11.003 · Cited by 448
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Knorn, J., Rabe, A., Radeloff, V. C., Kuemmerle, T., Kozak, J., & Hostert, P.
- Venue
- Remote Sensing of Environment
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2009-05
- Volume
- 113
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 957-964
- ISSN
- 0034-4257 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2044020331
- Cited by
- 255
- References
- 37
- FWCI
- 35.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Land cover mapping of large areas using chain classification of neighboring Landsat satellite images. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.rse.2009.01.010
- The paper
- Knorn, J., Rabe, A., Radeloff, V. C., Kuemmerle, T., Kozak, J., & Hostert, P. (2009). Land cover mapping of large areas using chain classification of neighboring Landsat satellite images. Remote Sensing of Environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2009.01.010
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.