The DOI matches its Crossref record; 40 of the 40 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Estimating biomass carbon stocks for a Mediterranean forest in central Spain using LiDAR height and intensity data
Open accessAbstract
Abstract Biomass fractions (total aboveground, branches and foliage) were estimated from a small footprint discrete-return LiDAR system in an unmanaged Mediterranean forest in central Spain. Several biomass estimation models based on LiDAR height, intensity or height combined with intensity data were explored. Raw intensity data were normalized to a standard range in order to remove the range dependence of the intensity signal. In general terms, intensity-based models provided more accurate predictions of the biomass fractions. Height models selected were mainly based on a percentile of the height distribution. Intensity models selected included variables that consider the percentage of the intensity accumulated at different height percentiles, which implicitly take into account the height distribution. The general models derived considering all species together were based on height combined with intensity data. These models yielded R 2 values greater than 0.58 for the different biomass fractions considered and RMSE values of 28.89, 18.28 and 1.51 Mg ha − 1 for aboveground, branch and foliage biomass, respectively. Results greatly improved for species-specific models using the main species present in each plot, with R 2 values greater than 0.85, 0.70 and 0.90 for black pine, Spanish juniper and Holm oak, respectively, and with lower RMSE for the biomass fractions. Reductions in LiDAR point density had only a small effect on the results obtained, except for those models based on a variation of the Canopy Reflection Sum, which was weighted by the mean point density. Based on the species-specific equations derived, Holm oak dominated plots showed the highest average carbon contained by aboveground biomass and branch biomass 44.66 and 31.42 Mg ha − 1 respectively, while for foliage biomass carbon, Spanish juniper showed the highest average value (3.04 Mg ha − 1 ).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Some Comments on the Evaluation of Model Performance
Willmott, C. J. (1982) · Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society · doi:10.1175/1520-0477(1982)063<1309:scoteo>2.0.co;2 · Cited by 3,736
Global Forest Resources Assessment 2020
(2020) · doi:10.4060/ca9825en · Cited by 3,408
FARSITE: Fire Area Simulator-model development and evaluation
Finney, M. A. (1998) · doi:10.2737/rmrs-rp-4 · Cited by 1,617
Correcting for Bias in Log‐Transformed Allometric Equations
Sprugel, D. G. (1983) · Ecology · doi:10.2307/1937343 · Cited by 884
Hicks, W. K., Whitfield, C. P., Bealey, W. J., & Sutton, M. A. (2011) · NERC Open Research Archive (Natural Environment Research Council) · Cited by 817
Wagner, W., Ullrich, A., Ducic, V., Melzer, T., & Studnicka, N. (2006) · ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2005.12.001 · Cited by 762
Estimation of tropical forest structural characteristics using large-footprint lidar
Drake, J. B., Dubayah, R. O., Clark, D. B., Knox, R. G., Blair, J. B., Hofton, M. A., Chazdon, R. L., Weishampel, J. F., & Prince, S. (2002) · Remote Sensing of Environment · doi:10.1016/s0034-4257(01)00281-4 · Cited by 606
Surface Lidar Remote Sensing of Basal Area and Biomass in Deciduous Forests of Eastern Maryland, USA
Lefsky, M. A., Harding, D., Cohen, W. B., Parker, G., & Shugart, H. H. (1999) · Remote Sensing of Environment · doi:10.1016/s0034-4257(98)00071-6 · Cited by 587
Foody, G. M., Boyd, D. S., & Cutler, M. E. J. (2003) · Remote Sensing of Environment · doi:10.1016/s0034-4257(03)00039-7 · Cited by 580
Correction of laser scanning intensity data: Data and model-driven approaches
Höfle, B., & Pfeifer, N. (2007) · ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2007.05.008 · Cited by 558
Cited by
Above ground biomass estimation in an African tropical forest with lidar and hyperspectral data
Vaglio Laurin, G., Chen, Q., Lindsell, J. A., Coomes, D. A., Frate, F. D., Guerriero, L., Pirotti, F., & Valentini, R. (2014) · ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2014.01.001 · Cited by 301
Frazer, G. W., Magnussen, S., Wulder, M. A., & Niemann, K. O. (2011) · Remote Sensing of Environment · doi:10.1016/j.rse.2010.10.008 · Cited by 286
Modelling Carbon Stocks and Fluxes in the Wood Product Sector: A Comparative Review
Brunet‐Navarro, P., Jochheim, H., & Muys, B. (2016) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/gcb.13235 · Cited by 92
Brunet-Navarro, P., Jochheim, H., & Muys, B. (2017) · Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change · doi:10.1007/s11027-016-9722-z · Cited by 65
Metadata
- Authors
- García, M., Riaño, D., Chuvieco, E., & Danson, F. M.
- Venue
- Remote Sensing of Environment
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2010-04
- Volume
- 114
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 816-830
- ISSN
- 0034-4257 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2114228414
- Cited by
- 360
- References
- 40
- FWCI
- 19.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Estimating biomass carbon stocks for a Mediterranean forest in central Spain using LiDAR height and intensity data. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.rse.2009.11.021
- The paper
- García, M., Riaño, D., Chuvieco, E., & Danson, F. M. (2010). Estimating biomass carbon stocks for a Mediterranean forest in central Spain using LiDAR height and intensity data. Remote Sensing of Environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2009.11.021
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.