Assessment of deforestation in the Lower Amazon floodplain using historical Landsat MSS/TM imagery
Abstract
The floodplain forests bordering the Amazon River have outstanding ecological, economic, and social importance for the region. However, the original distribution of these forests is not well known, since they have suffered severe degradation since the 16th century. The previously published vegetation map of the Amazon River floodplain (Hess et al., 2003), based on data acquired in 1996, shows enormous difference in vegetation cover classes between the regions upstream and downstream of the city of Manaus. The upper floodplain is mostly covered by forests, while the lower floodplain is predominantly occupied by grasses and shrubs. This study assesses deforestation in the Lower Amazon floodplain over a ~30 year period by producing and comparing a historical vegetation map based on MSS/Landsat images acquired in the late 1970s with a recent vegetation map produced from TM/Landsat images obtained in 2008. The maps were generated through the following steps: 1) normalization and mosaicking of images for each decade; 2) application of a linear mixing model transformation to produce vegetation, soil and shade fraction-images; and 3) object-oriented image analysis and classification. For both maps, the following classes were mapped: floodplain forest, non-forest floodplain vegetation, bare soil and open water. The two maps were combined using object-level Boolean operations to identify time transitions among the mapped classes, resulting in a map of the land cover change occurred ove…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the lower Amazon River floodplain, agriculture-driven deforestation has caused a 50% decline in forest cover since 1970.
“In the lower Amazon River floodplain, agriculture‐driven deforestation has caused a 50% decline in forest cover since 1970 (Renó et al., 2011).”
From Threshold responses of floating meadow fish communities to floodplain forest cover in the lower Amazon River (2025) · cites this paper as Renó et al., 2011
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Grinstead, S., Arantes, C. C., Winemiller, K. O., Kelso‐Winemiller, L. C., de Oliveira, J. A., Petrere, M., & Freitas, C. E. C. (2025) · Conservation Biology · doi:10.1111/cobi.70110
- Authors
- Renó, V. F., Novo, E. M. L. M., Suemitsu, C., Rennó, C. D., & Silva, T. S. F.
- Affiliations
- Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais (BR)
- Universidade Federal do Pará (BR)
- Corresponding author
- Renó, Vivian F.
- Venue
- Remote Sensing of Environment
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2011-12
- Volume
- 115
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 3446-3456
- ISSN
- 0034-4257 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2025286685
- Cited by
- 92
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 7.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Remote Sensing of Environment (publishedVersion)
- Biblioteca Digital da Memória Científica do INPE (National Institute for Space Research) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Media Technology › Remote-Sensing Image Classification
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Remote Sensing in Agriculture
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Remote Sensing and Land Use
- Keywords
- deforestation, Lower Amazon, Landsat MSS, Landsat TM, linear spectral mixture model, object-oriented image classification, land cover change, vegetation cover, Manaus, map validation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review