The DOI matches its Crossref record; 77 of the 77 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Large-area mapping of Canadian boreal forest cover, height, biomass and other structural attributes using Landsat composites and lidar plots
Open accessAbstract
Passive optical remotely sensed images such as those from the Landsat satellites enable the development of spatially comprehensive, well-calibrated reflectance measures that support large-area mapping. In recent years, as an alternative to field plot data, the use of Light Detection and Ranging (lidar) acquisitions for calibration and validation purposes in combination with such satellite reflectance data to model a range of forest structural response variables has become well established. In this research, we use a predictive modeling approach to map forest structural attributes over the ~ 552 million ha boreal forest of Canada. For model calibration and independent validation we utilize airborne lidar-derived measurements of forest vertical structure (known as lidar plots) obtained in 2010 via a > 25,000 km transect-based national survey. Models were developed linking the lidar plot structural variables to wall-to-wall 30-m spatial resolution surface reflectance composites derived from Landsat Thematic Mapper and Enhanced Thematic Mapper Plus imagery. Spectral indices extracted from the composites, disturbance information (years since disturbance and type), as well as geographic position and topographic variables (i.e., elevation, slope, radiation, etc.) were considered as predictor variables. A nearest neighbor imputation approach based on the Random Forest framework was used to predict a total of 10 forest structural attributes. The model was developed and validated on > 80,000 lidar plots, with R2 values ranging from 0.49 to 0.61 for key response variables such as canopy cover, stand height, basal area, stem volume, and aboveground biomass. Additionally, a predictor variable importance analysis confirmed that spectral indices, elevation, and geographic coordinates were key sources of information, ultimately offering an improved understanding of the driving variables for large-area forest structure modeling. This study demonstrates the integration of airborne lidar and Landsat-derived reflectance products to generate detailed and spatially extensive maps of forest structure. The methods are portable to map other attributes of interest (based upon calibration data) through access to Landsat or other appropriate optical remotely-sensed data sources, thereby offering unique opportunities for science, monitoring, and reporting programs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Breiman, L. (2001) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1023/a:1010933404324 · Cited by 133,538
Classification and Regression by randomForest
Liaw, A. I., & Wiener, M. C. (2007) · Cited by 18,594
Random forest in remote sensing: A review of applications and future directions
Belgiu, M., & Drăguţ, L. (2016) · ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2016.01.011 · Cited by 7,142
BEVEN, K. J., & KIRKBY, M. J. (1979) · Hydrological Sciences Bulletin · doi:10.1080/02626667909491834 · Cited by 6,670
Matheron, G. (1963) · Economic Geology · doi:10.2113/gsecongeo.58.8.1246 · Cited by 4,845
Sentinel-2: ESA's Optical High-Resolution Mission for GMES Operational Services
Drusch, M., Del Bello, U., Carlier, S., Colin, O., Fernandez, V., Gascon, F., Hoersch, B., Isola, C., Laberinti, P., Martimort, P., et al. (2012) · Remote Sensing of Environment · doi:10.1016/j.rse.2011.11.026 · Cited by 4,815
Gunst, R. F. (1999) · Technometrics · doi:10.1080/00401706.1999.10485680 · Cited by 4,002
A physically based, variable contributing area model of basin hydrology
Kirkby, M. J., & Beven, K. (1979) · Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University) · Cited by 3,962
Landsat-8: Science and product vision for terrestrial global change research
Roy, D. P., Wulder, M. A., Loveland, T. R., C.E., W., Allen, R. G., Anderson, M. C., Helder, D., Irons, J. R., Johnson, D. M., Kennedy, R., et al. (2014) · Remote Sensing of Environment · doi:10.1016/j.rse.2014.02.001 · Cited by 2,659
Self-citationRandom Forests for land cover classification
Gislason, P. O., Benediktsson, J. A., & Sveinsson, J. R. (2006) · Pattern Recognition Letters · doi:10.1016/j.patrec.2005.08.011 · Cited by 2,244
Cited by
Mapping global forest canopy height through integration of GEDI and Landsat data
Potapov, P., Li, X., Hernandez-Serna, A., Tyukavina, A., Hansen, M. C., Kommareddy, A., Pickens, A., Turubanova, S., Tang, H., Silva, C. E., et al. (2021) · Remote Sensing of Environment · doi:10.1016/j.rse.2020.112165 · Cited by 1,383
Coops, N. C., Tompalski, P., Goodbody, T. R. H., Queinnec, M., Luther, J. E., Bolton, D. K., White, J. C., Wulder, M. A., van Lier, O. R., & Hermosilla, T. (2021) · Remote Sensing of Environment · doi:10.1016/j.rse.2021.112477 · Cited by 406
Self-citationRoy, D. P., Kashongwe, H. B., & Armston, J. (2021) · Science of Remote Sensing · doi:10.1016/j.srs.2021.100024 · Cited by 112
Metadata
- Authors
- Matasci, G., Hermosilla, T., Wulder, M. A., White, J. C., Coops, N. C., Hobart, G. W., & Zald, H. S. J.
- Venue
- Remote Sensing of Environment
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-05
- Volume
- 209
- Pages
- 90-106
- ISSN
- 0034-4257 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2790602384
- Cited by
- 294
- References
- 77
- FWCI
- 13.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Large-area mapping of Canadian boreal forest cover, height, biomass and other structural attributes using Landsat composites and lidar plots. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.rse.2017.12.020
- The paper
- Matasci, G., Hermosilla, T., Wulder, M. A., White, J. C., Coops, N. C., Hobart, G. W., & Zald, H. S. J. (2018). Large-area mapping of Canadian boreal forest cover, height, biomass and other structural attributes using Landsat composites and lidar plots. Remote Sensing of Environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2017.12.020
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.