On the determination of global ocean wind and wave climate from satellite observations
Abstract
Three extensive global wind speed and wave height datasets (altimeter, radiometer, model reanalysis) are analysed to investigate the global wind speed and wave height climate. Despite the fact that these datasets have all been carefully calibrated, they show systematic differences in wind speed. At high latitudes both altimeter and radiometer winds are biased high compared to buoy measurements. Altimeter winds are more impacted than radiometer winds. Based on the assumptions that altimeter winds respond primarily to the surface wave spectrum mean squared slope and radiometer winds respond primarily to the surface wave spectrum dissipation, it is shown that the observed differences are a result of changes in atmospheric stability. An analysis which accounts for differences in air and water temperatures describes the observed differences with surprising accuracy. Based on this analysis corrections to both altimeter and radiometer winds are proposed which account for the influence of atmospheric stability. It is also shown that satellites preferentially measure at particular local times of day. As winds have a diurnal variation in magnitude, this preferential measurement time can also bias statistical values obtained from such satellite systems.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The difference in SST annual variability reflects the larger annual cycle in wind speed in the northern hemisphere, with lower summertime wind speeds.
“This difference in SST annual variability reflects the larger annual cycle in wind speed in the northern hemisphere, with lower summertime wind speeds52.”
From Tendencies, variability and persistence of sea surface temperature anomalies (2020) · cites this paper as [52]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Tendencies, variability and persistence of sea surface temperature anomalies
Bulgin, C. E., Merchant, C. J., & Ferreira, D. (2020) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-020-64785-9 · Cited by 150 · see citing works
- Authors
- Young, I. R., & Donelan, M. A.
- Affiliations
- The University of Melbourne (AU)
- University of Miami (US)
- Corresponding author
- Young, I.R.
- Venue
- Remote Sensing of Environment
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-09
- Volume
- 215
- Pages
- 228-241
- ISSN
- 0034-4257 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2807960135
- Cited by
- 70
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 2
- FWCI
- 4.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Remote Sensing of Environment (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Australian Research CouncilAustralian Research Council (ARC) (DP130100215, DP160100738)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Ocean Waves and Remote Sensing
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
- Keywords
- wave height, satellite altimetry, scatterometer, atmospheric stability, buoy measurements, wind speed bias, wave energy dissipation, diurnal variation, reanalysis data
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review