CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 56

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Characterizing understory vegetation in Mediterranean forests using full-waveform airborne laser scanning data

Crespo-Peremarch, Pablo, Tompalski, Piotr, Coops, Nicholas C., Ruiz, Luis Ángel·2018·Remote Sensing of Environment
DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2018.08.033
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.rse.2018.08.033

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 40

  1. Anderson, 2016, Is waveform worth it? A comparison of LiDAR approaches for vegetation and landscape characterization, Remote Sens. Ecol. Conser., 2, 5, 10.1002/rse2.8 · DOI
  2. Axelsson, 2000, DEM generation from laser scanner data using adaptive TIN models, Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote. Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci., 33, 111
  3. Barbier, 2008, Influence of tree species on understory vegetation diversity and mechanisms involved—a critical review for temperate and boreal forests, For. Ecol. Manag., 254, 1, 10.1016/j.foreco.2007.09.038 · DOI
  4. Beatty, 1984, Influence of microtopography and canopy species on spatial patterns of forest understory plants, Ecology, 65, 1406, 10.2307/1939121 · DOI
  5. Canfield, 1941, Application of the line interception method in sampling range vegetation, J. For., 39, 388
  6. Cao, 2014, Using small-footprint discrete and full-waveform airborne LiDAR metrics to estimate total biomass and biomass components in subtropical forests, Remote Sens., 6, 7110, 10.3390/rs6087110 · DOI
  7. Chasmer, 2006, Investigating laser pulse penetration through a conifer canopy by integrating airborne and terrestrial lidar, Can. J. Remote. Sens., 32, 116, 10.5589/m06-011 · DOI
  8. Duncanson, 2010, Estimating forest canopy height and terrain relief from GLAS waveform metrics, Remote Sens. Environ., 114, 138, 10.1016/j.rse.2009.08.018 · DOI
  9. Estornell, 2011, Study of shrub cover and height using LiDAR data in a Mediterranean area, For. Sci., 57, 171
  10. Ferrari, 2004, Beta regression for modelling rates and proportions, J. Appl. Stat., 31, 799, 10.1080/0266476042000214501 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Fieber, 2015, Validation of canopy height profile methodology for small-footprint full-waveform airborne LiDAR data in a discontinuous canopy environment, ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens., 104, 144, 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2015.03.001 · DOI
  12. Greaves, 2015, Estimating aboveground biomass and leaf area of low-stature Arctic shrubs with terrestrial LiDAR, Remote Sens. Environ., 164, 26, 10.1016/j.rse.2015.02.023 · DOI
  13. Hancock, 2015, Waveform lidar over vegetation: an evaluation of inversion methods for estimating return energy, Remote Sens. Environ., 164, 208, 10.1016/j.rse.2015.04.013 · DOI
  14. Hancock, 2017, Measurement of fine-spatial-resolution 3D vegetation structure with airborne waveform lidar: calibration and validation with voxelised terrestrial lidar, Remote Sens. Environ., 188, 37, 10.1016/j.rse.2016.10.041 · DOI
  15. Harding, 2001, Laser altimeter canopy height profiles: methods and validation for closed-canopy, broadleaf forests, Remote Sens. Environ., 76, 283, 10.1016/S0034-4257(00)00210-8 · DOI
  16. Hermosilla, 2014, Estimation of forest structure and canopy fuel parameters from small-footprint full-waveform LiDAR data, Int. J. Wildland Fire, 23, 224, 10.1071/WF13086 · DOI
  17. Hermosilla, 2014, Deriving pseudo-vertical waveforms from small-footprint full-waveform LiDAR data, Remote Sens. Lett., 5, 332, 10.1080/2150704X.2014.903350 · DOI
  18. Hilker, 2010, Comparing canopy metrics derived from terrestrial and airborne laser scanning in a Douglas-fir dominated forest stand, Trees, 24, 819, 10.1007/s00468-010-0452-7 · DOI
  19. Hill, 2009, Mapping the understorey of deciduous woodland from leaf-on and leaf-off airborne LiDAR data: a case study in lowland Britain, ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens., 64, 223, 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2008.12.004 · DOI
  20. Hofton, 2000, Decomposition of laser altimeter waveforms, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., 38, 1989, 10.1109/36.851780 · DOI
  21. Hopkinson, 2013, Integrating terrestrial and airborne lidar to calibrate a 3D canopy model of effective leaf area index, Remote Sens. Environ., 136, 301, 10.1016/j.rse.2013.05.012 · DOI
  22. Johnson, 2014, Extension of Nakagawa and Schielzeth's R2GLMM to random slopes models, Methods Ecol. Evol., 5, 944, 10.1111/2041-210X.12225 · DOI
  23. Kerr, 2003, From space to species: ecological applications for remote sensing, Trends Ecol. Evol., 18, 299, 10.1016/S0169-5347(03)00071-5 · DOI
  24. Kimes, 2006, Predicting lidar measured forest vertical structure from multi-angle spectral data, Remote Sens. Environ., 100, 503, 10.1016/j.rse.2005.11.004 · DOI
  25. Kobal, 2015, Using Lidar data to analyse sinkhole characteristics relevant for understory vegetation under forest cover – case study of a high karst area in the Dinaric Mountains, PLoS One, 10, 10.1371/journal.pone.0122070 · DOI
  26. Lefsky, 2005, Estimates of forest canopy height and aboveground biomass using ICESat, Geophys. Res. Lett., 32, 10.1029/2005GL023971 · DOI
  27. Liang, 2016, Terrestrial laser scanning in forest inventories, ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens., 115, 63, 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2016.01.006 · DOI
  28. Maas, 2008, Automatic forest inventory parameter determination from terrestrial laser scanner data, Int. J. Remote Sens., 29, 1579, 10.1080/01431160701736406 · DOI
  29. Martinuzzi, 2009, Mapping snags and understory shrubs for a LiDAR-based assessment of wildlife habitat suitability, Remote Sens. Environ., 113, 2533, 10.1016/j.rse.2009.07.002 · DOI
  30. McDermid, 2005, Remote sensing for large-area habitat mapping, Prog. Phys. Geogr., 29, 449, 10.1191/0309133305pp455ra · DOI
  31. Molina, 2011, Potential crown fire behavior in Pinus pinea stands following different fuel treatments, For. Syst., 20, 266, 10.5424/fs/2011202-10923 · DOI
  32. Morsdorf, 2010, Discrimination of vegetation strata in a multi-layered Mediterranean forest ecosystem using height and intensity information derived from airborne laser scanning, Remote Sens. Environ., 114, 1403, 10.1016/j.rse.2010.01.023 · DOI
  33. Nakagawa, 2013, A general and simple method for obtaining R2 from generalized linear mixed-effects models, Methods Ecol. Evol., 4, 133, 10.1111/j.2041-210x.2012.00261.x · DOI · Paper page
  34. Riaño, 2007, Estimation of shrub height for fuel-type mapping combining airborne LiDAR and simultaneous color infrared ortho imaging, Int. J. Wildland Fire, 16, 341, 10.1071/WF06003 · DOI
  35. Royo, 2006, On the formation of dense understory layers in forests worldwide: consequences and implications for forest dynamics, biodiversity, and succession, Can. J. For. Res., 36, 1345, 10.1139/x06-025 · DOI
  36. Ruiz, 2018, An object-based approach for mapping forest structural types based on low-density LiDAR and multispectral imagery, Geochem. Int., 33, 443
  37. Suchar, 2010, Understory cover and biomass indices predictions for forest ecosystems of the Northwestern United States, Ecol. Indic., 10, 602, 10.1016/j.ecolind.2009.10.004 · DOI
  38. Vierling, 2013, Shrub characterization using terrestrial laser scanning and implications for airborne LiDAR assessment, Can. J. Remote. Sens., 38, 709, 10.5589/m12-057 · DOI
  39. Wing, 2012, Prediction of understory vegetation cover with airborne lidar in an interior ponderosa pine forest, Remote Sens. Environ., 124, 730, 10.1016/j.rse.2012.06.024 · DOI · Paper page
  40. Zhang, 2011, Full waveform-based analysis for forest type information derivation from large footprint spaceborne lidar data, Photogramm. Eng. Remote. Sens., 77, 281, 10.14358/PERS.77.3.281 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Crespo-Peremarch, P., Tompalski, P., Coops, N. C., & Ruiz, L. Á.
Venue
Remote Sensing of Environment
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-11
Volume
217
Pages
400-413
ISSN
0034-4257
DOI
10.1016/j.rse.2018.08.033
Cited by
56
References
0
Language
en
Licence
Funders
  • Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad
  • European Regional Development Fund (CGL2016-80705-R)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review