The DOI matches its Crossref record; 130 of the 130 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Crop nitrogen monitoring: Recent progress and principal developments in the context of imaging spectroscopy missions
Open accessAbstract
Nitrogen (N) is considered as one of the most important plant macronutrients and proper management of N therefore is a pre-requisite for modern agriculture. Continuous satellite-based monitoring of this key plant trait would help to understand individual crop N use efficiency and thus would enable site-specific N management. Since hyperspectral imaging sensors could provide detailed measurements of spectral signatures corresponding to the optical activity of chemical constituents, they have a theoretical advantage over multi-spectral sensing for the detection of crop N. The current study aims to provide a state-of-the-art overview of crop N retrieval methods from hyperspectral data in the agricultural sector and in the context of future satellite imaging spectroscopy missions. Over 400 studies were reviewed for this purpose, identifying those estimating mass-based N (N concentration, N%) and area-based N (N content, Narea) using hyperspectral remote sensing data. Retrieval methods of the 125 studies selected in this review can be grouped into: (1) parametric regression methods, (2) linear nonparametric regression methods or chemometrics, (3) nonlinear nonparametric regression methods or machine learning regression algorithms, (4) physically-based or radiative transfer models (RTM), (5) use of alternative data sources (sun-induced fluorescence, SIF) and (6) hybrid or combined techniques. Whereas in the last decades methods for estimation of Narea and N% from hyperspectral data have been mainly based on simple parametric regression algorithms, such as narrowband vegetation indices, there is an increasing trend of using machine learning, RTM and hybrid techniques. Within plants, N is invested in proteins and chlorophylls stored in the leaf cells, with the proteins being the major nitrogen-containing biochemical constituent. However, in most studies, the relationship between N and chlorophyll content was used to estimate crop N, focusing on the visible-near infrared (VNIR) spectral domains, and thus neglecting protein-related N and reallocation of nitrogen to non-photosynthetic compartments. Therefore, we recommend exploiting the estimation of nitrogen via the proxy of proteins using hyperspectral data and in particular the short-wave infrared (SWIR) spectral domain. We further strongly encourage a standardization of nitrogen terminology, distinguishing between N% and Narea. Moreover, the exploitation of physically-based approaches is highly recommended combined with machine learning regression algorithms, which represents an interesting perspective for future research in view of new spaceborne imaging spectroscopy sensors.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Breiman, L. (2001) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1023/a:1010933404324 · Cited by 133,538
A tutorial on support vector regression
Smola, A. J., & Schölkopf, B. (2004) · Statistics and Computing · doi:10.1023/b:stco.0000035301.49549.88 · Cited by 13,387
Gaussian Processes for Machine Learning
Rasmussen, C. E., & Williams, C. K. I. (2005) · doi:10.7551/mitpress/3206.001.0001 · Cited by 11,705
PLS-regression: a basic tool of chemometrics
Wold, S., Sjöström, M., & Eriksson, L. (2001) · Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems · doi:10.1016/s0169-7439(01)00155-1 · Cited by 10,084
The worldwide leaf economics spectrum
Wright, I. J., Reich, P. B., Westoby, M., Ackerly, D. D., Baruch, Z., Bongers, F., Cavender-Bares, J., Chapin, T., Cornelissen, J. H. C., Diemer, M., et al. (2004) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02403 · Cited by 9,021
Random forest in remote sensing: A review of applications and future directions
Belgiu, M., & Drăguţ, L. (2016) · ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2016.01.011 · Cited by 7,142
Photosynthesis and nitrogen relationships in leaves of C3 plants
Evans, J. R. (1989) · Oecologia · doi:10.1007/bf00377192 · Cited by 3,400
Near-Infrared Technology: In the Agricultural and Food Industries
Williams, P. C., & Norris, K. (2001) · Andalas University Repository (Andalas University) · Cited by 2,749
Keshava, N., & Mustard, J. F. (2002) · IEEE Signal Processing Magazine · doi:10.1109/79.974727 · Cited by 2,549
PROSPECT: A model of leaf optical properties spectra
Jacquemoud, S., & Baret, F. (1990) · Remote Sensing of Environment · doi:10.1016/0034-4257(90)90100-z · Cited by 2,400
Metadata
- Authors
- Berger, K., Verrelst, J., Féret, J.-B., Wang, Z., Wocher, M., Strathmann, M., Danner, M., Mauser, W., & Hank, T.
- Venue
- Remote Sensing of Environment
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-06
- Volume
- 242
- Pages
- 111758
- ISSN
- 0034-4257 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3010955769
- Cited by
- 429
- References
- 130
- FWCI
- 23.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Crop nitrogen monitoring: Recent progress and principal developments in the context of imaging spectroscopy missions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.rse.2020.111758
- The paper
- Berger, K., Verrelst, J., Féret, J.-B., Wang, Z., Wocher, M., Strathmann, M., Danner, M., Mauser, W., & Hank, T. (2020). Crop nitrogen monitoring: Recent progress and principal developments in the context of imaging spectroscopy missions. Remote Sensing of Environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2020.111758
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.