Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 941

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A review on emission analysis in cement industries

Ali, M.B., Saidur, R., Hossain, M.S.·2011·Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.rser.2011.02.014

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 24

  1. Avami, 2007, Energy conservation opportunities: cement industry in Iran, International Journal of Energy, 1, 65
  2. Deja, 2010, CO2 emissions from Polish cement industry, International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 4, 583, 10.1016/j.ijggc.2010.02.002 · DOI
  3. Damineli, 2010, Measuring the eco-efficiency of cement use, Cement and Concrete Composites, 32, 555, 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2010.07.009 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Xu, 2009, Energy use and implications for efficiency strategies in global fluid-milk processing industry, Energy Policy, 37, 5334, 10.1016/j.enpol.2009.07.056 · doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2009.07.056
  5. Taylor, 2006, Energy efficiency and CO2 emissions from the global cement industry, Korea, 50
  6. Anand, 2006, Application of a system dynamics approach for assessment and mitigation of CO2 emissions from the cement industry, Journal of Environmental Management, 79, 383, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2005.08.007 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Yeonbae, 2002, CO2 emission trends in the cement industry: an international comparison, Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 7, 1, 10.1023/A:1015860421954 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Gonzalez JLA. Technology change and environmental management for cement manufacturing: the cement industry in the United States (2004–2050). PhD thesis, Carnegie Mellon Unversity; 2005.
  9. Bosoaga, 2009, CO2 capture technologies for cement industry, Energy Procedia, 1, 133, 10.1016/j.egypro.2009.01.020 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Oh, 2010, Energy efficiency and carbon trading potential in Malaysia, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 14, 2095, 10.1016/j.rser.2010.03.029 · DOI
  11. Caruso H. Reduction of carbon dioxide emissions from cement plants. Thesis, University of Waterloo, Canada: Canada; 2007.
  12. Stefanovic, 2010, CO2 reduction options in cement industry-the Novi Popovac case, Thermal Science, 14, 671, 10.2298/TSCI091211014S · doi:10.2298/tsci091211014s
  13. Habert, 2010, Cement production technology improvement compared to factor 4 objectives, Cement and Concrete Research, 40, 820, 10.1016/j.cemconres.2009.09.031 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Barker, 2009, CO2 capture in the cement industry, Energy Procedia, 1, 87, 10.1016/j.egypro.2009.01.014 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Ogbeide, 2010, Developing an optimization model for CO2 reduction in cement production process, Journal of Engineering Science and Technology Review, 3, 85, 10.25103/jestr.031.15 · doi:10.25103/jestr.031.15
  16. Hasanbeigi, 2010, Analysis of energy-efficiency opportunities for the cement industry in Shandong Province, China: a case study of 16 cement plants, Energy, 35, 3461, 10.1016/j.energy.2010.04.046 · doi:10.1016/j.energy.2010.04.046
  17. Worrell E, Christina G, Lynn P. Energy efficiency improvement opportunities for the cement industry, LBNL-72E; 2008. · doi:10.2172/939891
  18. Hasanbeigi, 2010, The use of conservation supply curves in energy policy and economic analysis: the case studies of Thai cement industry, Energy Policy, 38, 392, 10.1016/j.enpol.2009.09.030 · doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2009.09.030
  19. Worrell, 2000, Potentials for energy efficiency improvement in the US cement industry, Energy, 25, 189, 10.1016/S0360-5442(00)00042-6 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Damtoft, 2008, Sustainable development and climate change initiatives, Cement and Concrete Research, 38, 115, 10.1016/j.cemconres.2007.09.008 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Mokrzycki, 2003, Use of alternative fuels in the Polish cement industry, Applied Energy, 74, 101, 10.1016/S0306-2619(02)00136-8 · DOI
  22. Kääntee, 2004, Cement manufacturing using alternative fuels and the advantages of process modelling, Fuel Processing Technology, 85, 293, 10.1016/S0378-3820(03)00203-0 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Mokrzycki, 2003, Alternative fuels for the cement industry, Applied Energy, 74, 95, 10.1016/S0306-2619(02)00135-6 · DOI
  24. Kabir, 2010, Energy audit and conservation opportunities for pyroprocessing unit of a typical dry process cement plant, Energy, 35, 1237, 10.1016/j.energy.2009.11.003 · doi:10.1016/j.energy.2009.11.003

Cited by

See all 941

Metadata

Authors
Ali, M. B., Saidur, R., & Hossain, M. S.
Venue
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-06
Volume
15
Issue
5
Pages
2252-2261
ISSN
1364-0321 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2136600275
Cited by
941
References
1
FWCI
45.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A review on emission analysis in cement industries. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.rser.2011.02.014
The paper
Ali, M. B., Saidur, R., & Hossain, M. S. (2011). A review on emission analysis in cement industries. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2011.02.014

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.