The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The intensification technologies to water electrolysis for hydrogen production – A review
Open accessAbstract
Water electrolysis derived by renewable energy such as solar energy and wind energy is a sustainable method for hydrogen production due to high purity, simple and green process. One of the challenges is to reduce energy consumption of water electrolysis for large-scale application in future. Cell voltage, an important criterion of energy consumption, consists of theoretical decomposition voltage (Uθ), ohmic voltage drop (i⁎∑R) and reaction overpotential (η). The kinetic and thermodynamic roots of high cell voltage are analyzed systemically in this review. During water electrolysis, bubble coverage on electrode surface and bubble dispersion in electrolyte, namely bubble effect, result in high ohmic voltage drop and large reaction overpotential. Bubble effect is one of the most key factors for high energy consumption. Based on the theoretical analysis, we summarize and divide recent intensification technologies of water electrolysis into three categories: external field, new electrolyte composition and new thermodynamic reaction system. The fundamentals and development of these intensification technologies are discussed and reviewed. Reaction overpotential and ohmic voltage drop are improved kinetically by external field or new electrolyte composition. The thermodynamic decomposition voltage of water is also reduced by new reaction systems such as solid oxide electrolysis cell (SOEC) and carbon assisted water electrolysis (CAWE).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Laursen, A. B., Kegnæs, S., Dahl, S., & Chorkendorff, I. (2012) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c2ee02618j · Cited by 1,348
Wang, T., Liu, L., Zhu, Z., Papakonstantinou, P., Hu, J., Liu, H., & Li, M. (2013) · Energy Environ. Sci. · doi:10.1039/c2ee23513g · Cited by 393
Cited by
Noble metal-free hydrogen evolution catalysts for water splitting
Zou, X., & Zhang, Y. (2015) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c4cs00448e · Cited by 5,955
Chatenet, M., Pollet, B. G., Dekel, D. R., Dionigi, F., Deseure, J., Millet, P., Braatz, R. D., Bazant, M. Z., Eikerling, M., Staffell, I., et al. (2022) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/d0cs01079k · Cited by 2,025
An overview of water electrolysis technologies for green hydrogen production
Shiva Kumar, S., & Lim, H. (2022) · Energy Reports · doi:10.1016/j.egyr.2022.10.127 · Cited by 1,526
Hydrogen in energy transition: A review
Kovač, A., Paranos, M., & Marciuš, D. (2021) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.11.256 · Cited by 1,214
Raveendran, A., Chandran, M., & Dhanusuraman, R. (2023) · RSC Advances · doi:10.1039/d2ra07642j · Cited by 892
Metadata
- Authors
- Wang, M., Wang, Z., Gong, X., & Guo, Z.
- Venue
- Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-01
- Volume
- 29
- Pages
- 573-588
- ISSN
- 1364-0321 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2060584905
- Cited by
- 1,011
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 13.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The intensification technologies to water electrolysis for hydrogen production – A review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.rser.2013.08.090
- The paper
- Wang, M., Wang, Z., Gong, X., & Guo, Z. (2014). The intensification technologies to water electrolysis for hydrogen production – A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.08.090
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.