The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Vertical Greenery Systems (VGS) for energy saving in buildings: A review
Open accessAbstract
This review paper organizes and summarizes the literature on Vertical Greenery Systems (VGS) when used as passive tool for energy savings in buildings. First, with the information obtained in the reviewed literature some key aspects to consider when working with VGS are clarified, such as the classification systems, the climate influence, the plant species used and the different operating mechanisms. Then, the main conclusions of this literature, sorted by construction system (Green Walls or Green Façades) and climatic situation, are summarized. In general, it can be concluded that VGS provide great potential in reducing energy consumption in buildings, especially in the cooling periods. However, a lack of data on operation during the heating period as well as during the whole year has been found. On the other hand, results show that the investigations of VGS are not equally distributed around the world, being basically concentrated in Europe and Asia. Moreover, the review concludes that some aspects must be studied in depth, such as which species are the most suitable for each climate, influence on energy savings of the façade orientation, foliage thickness, presence of air layers, and finally, substrate layer composition and thickness in the case of green walls.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
World map of the Köppen-Geiger climate classification updated
Kottek, M., Grieser, J., Beck, C., Rudolf, B., & Rubel, F. (2006) · Meteorologische Zeitschrift · doi:10.1127/0941-2948/2006/0130 · Cited by 11,456
Temperature decreases in an urban canyon due to green walls and green roofs in diverse climates
Alexandri, E., & Jones, P. (2008) · Building and Environment · doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2006.10.055 · Cited by 967
Cited by
Green roofs and facades: A comprehensive review
Besir, A. B., & Cuce, E. (2018) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2017.09.106 · Cited by 616
Coma, J., Pérez, G., de Gracia, A., Burés, S., Urrestarazu, M., & Cabeza, L. F. (2017) · Building and Environment · doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2016.11.014 · Cited by 421
Self-citationGreen infrastructure for air quality improvement in street canyons
Tomson, M., Kumar, P., Barwise, Y., Perez, P., Forehead, H., French, K., Morawska, L., & Watts, J. F. (2021) · Environment International · doi:10.1016/j.envint.2020.106288 · Cited by 283
Pérez, G., Coma, J., Sol, S., & Cabeza, L. F. (2017) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.11.055 · Cited by 266
Self-citationGalagoda, R. U., Jayasinghe, G. Y., Halwatura, R. U., & Rupasinghe, H. T. (2018) · Urban Forestry & Urban Greening · doi:10.1016/j.ufug.2018.05.008 · Cited by 122
Metadata
- Authors
- Pérez, G., Coma, J., Martorell, I., & Cabeza, L. F.
- Venue
- Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-11
- Volume
- 39
- Pages
- 139-165
- ISSN
- 1364-0321 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2046121041
- Cited by
- 474
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 14.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Vertical Greenery Systems (VGS) for energy saving in buildings: A review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.rser.2014.07.055
- The paper
- Pérez, G., Coma, J., Martorell, I., & Cabeza, L. F. (2014). Vertical Greenery Systems (VGS) for energy saving in buildings: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.07.055
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.