Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 339

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 127 of the 127 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Combination of fungal and physicochemical processes for lignocellulosic biomass pretreatment – A review

Open access
Shirkavand, Ehsan, Baroutian, Saeid, Gapes, Daniel J., Young, Brent R.·2016·Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews

Abstract

Biofuel production from lignocellulose has recently been gaining much more attention as a result. One major problem of using lignocellulosic materials for the production of biofuel is the low accessibility of cellulose to enzymes and microorganisms. Therefore, pretreatment of lignocellulose is a critical step in biofuel production from such materials. Of the pretreatments, fungal treatment has become an important process due to its low energy demands and selective degradation of lignin and hemicellulose. This capability comes from the unique enzymatic systems, cellulolytic and ligninolytic enzymes, especially in white rot fungi. The low energy demand of fungal pretreatment has generated interest in studying the applicability of fungal pretreatment for biofuel production from woody materials. The most significant drawback of fungal pretreatment is the lengthy time required for the process. Combining fungal pretreatment with other pretreatment methods might reduce the time necessary for the whole process to operate. It can also introduce cost-effectiveness. Thus combining fungal pretreatment with other physical and chemical methods has been recently contemplated. This paper provides a comprehensive review of current fungal pretreatments and feasibility for biofuel production, with a focus on combining fungal pretreatment with other methods. The advantages and disadvantages of all physical and chemical methods were also briefly reviewed. The applicability of the combination of fungal with other pretreatment methods has been considered in a number of recent publications. To be commercially attractive, both energy demand and processing time should be reduced. In terms of energy demand reduction, combined fungal physico-chemical pretreatment has been effective. However, the lengthy time taken for the whole process has not been significantly improved upon. A great deal of work is still required to be done regarding time reduction for the process (combined fungal-physico chemical pretreatment). Therefore, it seems to remain an open field for research and process development.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.rser.2015.10.003

Cites

127 of 127 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 127 references

Cited by

See all 339

Metadata

Authors
Shirkavand, E., Baroutian, S., Gapes, D. J., & Young, B. R.
Venue
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-02
Volume
54
Pages
217-234
ISSN
1364-0321 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2153437626
Cited by
339
References
127
FWCI
7.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Combination of fungal and physicochemical processes for lignocellulosic biomass pretreatment – A review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.rser.2015.10.003
The paper
Shirkavand, E., Baroutian, S., Gapes, D. J., & Young, B. R. (2016). Combination of fungal and physicochemical processes for lignocellulosic biomass pretreatment – A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.10.003

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.