Cited by 189Global Energy Security and PolicyInfrastructure Resilience and Vulnerability AnalysisSustainability and Climate Change Governance

Measuring resilience in energy systems: Insights from a range of disciplines

Open access
Molyneaux, Lynette, Brown, Colin, Wagner, Liam, Foster, John·2016·Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.rser.2016.01.063

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • These generic characteristics include redundancy, functional diversity, adequate adaptability, firebreaks, and disorder.

    “These characteristics include: redundancy, functional diversity (often more important than redundancy), adequate adaptability (as appose to optimality), firebreaks (the capacity to island subsystems within networks to stop the spread of attacks or failures), and disorder [40].”

    From Energy system resilience – A review (2021) · cites this paper as [40]

  • Many generic characteristics which make the system resilient against a wide range of threats are known from various fields.

    “On the other hand, many generic characteristics which make the system resilient against a wide range of threats are known from various fields, where the resilience concept is used [40].”

    From Energy system resilience – A review (2021) · cites this paper as [40]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Molyneaux, L., Brown, C., Wagner, L., & Foster, J.
Affiliations
  • The University of Queensland (AU)
  • Griffith University (AU)
Corresponding author
Molyneaux, Lynette
Venue
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-06
Volume
59
Pages
1068-1079
ISSN
1364-0321 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2207117495
Cited by
189
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 25 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 53 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 3 · 2014: 1
FWCI
19.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Griffith Research Online (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › General Energy › Global Energy Security and Policy
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Infrastructure Resilience and Vulnerability Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
Keywords
resilience measurement, energy systems, adaptive capacity, energy security, ecosystem resilience, psychological resilience, risk management, redundancy, diversity, renewable energy, economic stability, oil supply security

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review