Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 355

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 67 of the 67 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

State of the art artificial intelligence-based MPPT techniques for mitigating partial shading effects on PV systems – A review

Open access
Seyedmahmoudian, M., Horan, B., Soon, T. Kok, Rahmani, R., Than Oo, A. Muang, Mekhilef, S., Stojcevski, A.·2016·Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews

Abstract

Given the considerable recent attention to distributed power generation and interest in sustainable energy, the integration of photovoltaic (PV) systems to grid-connected or isolated microgrids has become widespread. In order to maximize power output of PV system extensive research into control strategies for maximum power point tracking (MPPT) methods has been conducted. According to the robust, reliable, and fast performance of artificial intelligence-based MPPT methods, these approaches have been applied recently to various systems under different conditions. Given the diversity of recent advances to MPPT approaches a review focusing on the performance and reliability of these methods under diverse conditions is required. This paper reviews AI-based techniques proven to be effective and feasible to implement and very common in literature for MPPT, including their limitations and advantages. In order to support researchers in application of the reviewed techniques this study is not limited to reviewing the performance of recently adopted methods, rather discusses the background theory, application to MPPT systems, and important references relating to each method. It is envisioned that this review can be a valuable resource for researchers and engineers working with PV-based power systems to be able to access the basic theory behind each method, select the appropriate method according to project requirements, and implement MPPT systems to fulfill project objectives.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.rser.2016.06.053

Cites

67 of 67 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 67 references

Cited by

See all 355

Metadata

Authors
Seyedmahmoudian, M., Horan, B., Soon, T. K., Rahmani, R., Than Oo, A. M., Mekhilef, S., & Stojcevski, A.
Venue
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-10
Volume
64
Pages
435-455
ISSN
1364-0321 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2472782068
Cited by
355
References
67
FWCI
7.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: State of the art artificial intelligence-based MPPT techniques for mitigating partial shading effects on PV systems – A review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.rser.2016.06.053
The paper
Seyedmahmoudian, M., Horan, B., Soon, T. K., Rahmani, R., Than Oo, A. M., Mekhilef, S., & Stojcevski, A. (2016). State of the art artificial intelligence-based MPPT techniques for mitigating partial shading effects on PV systems – A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.06.053

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.