The DOI matches its Crossref record; 61 of the 61 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Evaluation of renewable energy sources in peripheral areas and renewable energy-based rural development
Open accessAbstract
The context and background of this study are based on the growing role of policy-driven renewable energy sources in improving energy security, protecting the climate, and encouraging economic development. In many cases, these high expectations are undermined by the lack of an integrated methodology for the measurement of renewable energy potential. Therefore, we assumed as the main hypothesis, the possibility of developing a complex and integrated evaluation methodology for renewable energy potential. Accordingly, we employed evaluation methods based on mapping techniques, simulation software for wind farms, and the analytical tools offered by the Geographical Information System. The main novelty of this study is related to the integration of three renewable energy sources (biomass, solar, and wind) and the respective measurement of their total renewable energy potential. The main results of the study consist of the estimation of three main renewable energy sources—solar, wind, and biomass energy—and the generation of maps showing the potential for solar, wind, and integrated biomass energy at a high spatial resolution. In addition, we have measured and mapped the total renewable energy potential available for supplying the local energy demand. The renewable energy potential maps, combined with a multidimensional index expressing the development level of localities, are good predictors of appropriate locations for the development of renewable energy source-based facilities. The study concludes with recommendations towards the use of the renewable energy potential maps as criteria for project allocation in future for renewable-based rural development, in order to achieve a more balanced regional development.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Path dependence and regional economic evolution
Martin, R., & Sunley, P. (2006) · Journal of Economic Geography · doi:10.1093/jeg/lbl012 · Cited by 2,422
4th Generation District Heating (4GDH)
Lund, H., Werner, S., Wiltshire, R., Svendsen, S., Thorsen, J. E., Hvelplund, F., & Mathiesen, B. V. (2014) · Energy · doi:10.1016/j.energy.2014.02.089 · Cited by 2,200
Local Geographic Spillovers between University Research and High Technology Innovations
Anselin, L., Varga, A., & Acs, Z. (1997) · Journal of Urban Economics · doi:10.1006/juec.1997.2032 · Cited by 1,672
Using bias-corrected reanalysis to simulate current and future wind power output
Staffell, I., & Pfenninger, S. (2016) · Energy · doi:10.1016/j.energy.2016.08.068 · Cited by 1,489
Community renewable energy: What should it mean?
Walker, G., & Devine-Wright, P. (2008) · Energy Policy · doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2007.10.019 · Cited by 1,008
Experimental evaluation of using various renewable energy sources for heating a greenhouse
Esen, M., & Yuksel, T. (2013) · Energy and Buildings · doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2013.06.018 · Cited by 939
Photovoltaic solar energy: Conceptual framework
Sampaio, P. G. V., & González, M. O. A. (2017) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2017.02.081 · Cited by 851
Šúri, M., Huld, T. A., Dunlop, E. D., & Ossenbrink, H. A. (2007) · Solar Energy · doi:10.1016/j.solener.2006.12.007 · Cited by 702
Biomass gasification for electricity generation: Review of current technology barriers
Ruiz, J. A., Juárez, M. C., Morales, M. P., Muñoz, P., & Mendívil, M. A. (2013) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2012.10.021 · Cited by 627
Bioenergy potential from crop residue biomass in India
Hiloidhari, M., Das, D., & Baruah, D. C. (2014) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2014.01.025 · Cited by 530
Cited by
Al-Shetwi, A. Q. (2022) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.153645 · Cited by 703
Hydrochars production, characterization and application for wastewater treatment: A review
Azzaz, A. A., Khiari, B., Jellali, S., Ghimbeu, C. M., & Jeguirim, M. (2020) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2020.109882 · Cited by 236
Metadata
- Authors
- Benedek, J., Sebestyén, T.-T., & Bartók, B.
- Venue
- Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-07
- Volume
- 90
- Pages
- 516-535
- ISSN
- 1364-0321 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2802114007
- Cited by
- 267
- References
- 61
- FWCI
- 6.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evaluation of renewable energy sources in peripheral areas and renewable energy-based rural development. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.rser.2018.03.020
- The paper
- Benedek, J., Sebestyén, T.-T., & Bartók, B. (2018). Evaluation of renewable energy sources in peripheral areas and renewable energy-based rural development. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.03.020
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.