Cited by 222Phase Change Materials ResearchAdsorption and Cooling SystemsThermal properties of materials

Organic phase change materials confined in carbon-based materials for thermal properties enhancement: Recent advancement and challenges

Tong, Xuan, Li, Nianqi, Zeng, Min, Wang, Qiuwang·2019·Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.rser.2019.03.031

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Latent heat storage (LHS) using phase change materials (PCMs) is a better option than thermochemical and sensible heat storage because it can reversibly store and release large quantities of thermal energy from the surrounding environment with small temperature variation during the phase change process.

    “Comparatively, LHS using phase change materials (PCMs) is considered a better option because it can reversibly store and release large quantities of thermal energy from the surrounding environment with small temperature variation during the phase change process.[ 4 , 5 ]”
  • Existing reviews on composite PCMs have mainly focused on thermal storage and thermal transfer enhancement, and their thermal enhancement mechanisms have mainly focused on structural level analysis and lacked microscale phonon mechanism analysis.

    “Although there are some published reviews on composite PCMs,[ 4 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 ] they have mainly focused on thermal storage and thermal transfer enhancement, and the corresponding thermal enhancement mechanisms have mainly focused on structural level analysis and have lacked microscale phonon mechanism analysis.[ 4 , 26 , 43 ]”
  • Graphene has an extremely high thermal conductivity of ≈5000 W mK−1, which is higher than that of SWCNTs.

    “More importantly, as a container of PCMs, graphene has an extremely high thermal conductivity of ≈5000 W mK−1, which is even higher than that of SWCNTs.[ 4 , 67 ]”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 177 · Cited by 222

Authors
Tong, X., Li, N., Zeng, M., & Wang, Q.
Affiliations
Xi'an Jiaotong University (CN)
Corresponding author
Zeng, Min
Venue
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-07
Volume
108
Pages
398-422
ISSN
1364-0321 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2940344330
Cited by
222
References
177
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 36 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 42 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 4
FWCI
14.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Phase Change Materials Research
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Adsorption and Cooling Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Thermal properties of materials
Keywords
organic phase change materials, thermal energy storage, carbon materials, thermal conductivity enhancement, carbon nanotubes, graphene, porous carbon, confinement effects, shape-stabilized phase change materials, latent heat, heat transfer mechanisms, thermal management, energy conversion

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review