Organic phase change materials confined in carbon-based materials for thermal properties enhancement: Recent advancement and challenges
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Latent heat storage (LHS) using phase change materials (PCMs) is a better option than thermochemical and sensible heat storage because it can reversibly store and release large quantities of thermal energy from the surrounding environment with small temperature variation during the phase change process.
“Comparatively, LHS using phase change materials (PCMs) is considered a better option because it can reversibly store and release large quantities of thermal energy from the surrounding environment with small temperature variation during the phase change process.[ 4 , 5 ]”
From Carbon-Based Composite Phase Change Materials for Thermal Energy Storage, Transfer, and Conversion (2021) · cites this paper as [4]
Existing reviews on composite PCMs have mainly focused on thermal storage and thermal transfer enhancement, and their thermal enhancement mechanisms have mainly focused on structural level analysis and lacked microscale phonon mechanism analysis.
“Although there are some published reviews on composite PCMs,[ 4 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 ] they have mainly focused on thermal storage and thermal transfer enhancement, and the corresponding thermal enhancement mechanisms have mainly focused on structural level analysis and have lacked microscale phonon mechanism analysis.[ 4 , 26 , 43 ]”
From Carbon-Based Composite Phase Change Materials for Thermal Energy Storage, Transfer, and Conversion (2021) · cites this paper as [4]
Graphene has an extremely high thermal conductivity of ≈5000 W mK−1, which is higher than that of SWCNTs.
“More importantly, as a container of PCMs, graphene has an extremely high thermal conductivity of ≈5000 W mK−1, which is even higher than that of SWCNTs.[ 4 , 67 ]”
From Carbon-Based Composite Phase Change Materials for Thermal Energy Storage, Transfer, and Conversion (2021) · cites this paper as [4]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 177 · Cited by 222
- Authors
- Tong, X., Li, N., Zeng, M., & Wang, Q.
- Affiliations
- Xi'an Jiaotong University (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Zeng, Min
- Venue
- Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-07
- Volume
- 108
- Pages
- 398-422
- ISSN
- 1364-0321 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2940344330
- Cited by
- 222
- References
- 177
- Citations by year
- 2026: 24 · 2025: 36 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 42 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 4
- FWCI
- 14.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Phase Change Materials Research
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Adsorption and Cooling Systems
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Thermal properties of materials
- Keywords
- organic phase change materials, thermal energy storage, carbon materials, thermal conductivity enhancement, carbon nanotubes, graphene, porous carbon, confinement effects, shape-stabilized phase change materials, latent heat, heat transfer mechanisms, thermal management, energy conversion
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review