The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Power-to-Gas: Electrolysis and methanation status review
Open accessAbstract
This review gives a worldwide overview on Power-to-Gas projects producing hydrogen or renewable substitute natural gas focusing projects in central Europe. It deepens and completes the content of previous reviews by including hitherto unreviewed projects and by combining project names with details such as plant location. It is based on data from 153 completed, recent and planned projects since 1988 which were evaluated with regards to plant allocation, installed power development, plant size, shares and amounts of hydrogen or substitute natural gas producing examinations and product utilization phases. Cost development for electrolysis and carbon dioxide methanation was analyzed and a projection until 2030 is given with an outlook to 2050. The results show substantial cost reductions for electrolysis as well as for methanation during the recent years and a further price decline to less than 500 euro per kilowatt electric power input for both technologies until 2050 is estimated if cost projection follows the current trend. Most of the projects examined are located in Germany, Denmark, the United States of America and Canada. Following an exponential global trend to increase installed power, today's Power-to-Gas applications are operated at about 39 megawatt. Hydrogen and substitute natural gas were investigated on equal terms concerning the number of projects.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Buttler, A., & Spliethoff, H. (2018) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2017.09.003 · Cited by 2,510
Cited by
Hydrogen production, storage, utilisation and environmental impacts: a review
Osman, A. I., Mehta, N., Elgarahy, A. M., Hefny, M., Al-Hinai, A., Al-Muhtaseb, A. H., & Rooney, D. W. (2022) · Environmental Chemistry Letters · doi:10.1007/s10311-021-01322-8 · Cited by 1,048
Emerging technologies by hydrogen: A review
Sazali, N. (2020) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.05.021 · Cited by 706
Battery cost forecasting: a review of methods and results with an outlook to 2050
Mauler, L., Duffner, F., Zeier, W. G., & Leker, J. (2021) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/d1ee01530c · Cited by 499
Recent trend in thermal catalytic low temperature CO2 methanation: A critical review
Lee, W. J., Li, C., Prajitno, H., Yoo, J., Patel, J., Yang, Y., & Lim, S. (2021) · Catalysis Today · doi:10.1016/j.cattod.2020.02.017 · Cited by 490
Kim, J., Sovacool, B. K., Bazilian, M., Griffiths, S., Lee, J., Yang, M., & Lee, J. (2022) · Energy Research & Social Science · doi:10.1016/j.erss.2022.102565 · Cited by 448
Metadata
- Authors
- Thema, M., Bauer, F., & Sterner, M.
- Venue
- Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-09
- Volume
- 112
- Pages
- 775-787
- ISSN
- 1364-0321 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2951373298
- Cited by
- 643
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 29.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Power-to-Gas: Electrolysis and methanation status review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.rser.2019.06.030
- The paper
- Thema, M., Bauer, F., & Sterner, M. (2019). Power-to-Gas: Electrolysis and methanation status review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2019.06.030
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
