The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A systematic comparison of biogas development and related policies between China and Europe and corresponding insights
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The development of the biogas sector in China has been motivated by the imperative to tackle the issues associated with managing agricultural waste, alongside the state's pledge to mitigate the impact of greenhouse gas emissions [171].”
From Anaerobic digestion of agricultural waste for biogas production and sustainable bioenergy recovery: a review (2024) · cites this paper as [171]
In the citing paper
“Whereas biogas has been successfully incorporated into district heating networks throughout Europe, benefiting both rural and urban regions [171].”
From Anaerobic digestion of agricultural waste for biogas production and sustainable bioenergy recovery: a review (2024) · cites this paper as [171]
In the citing paper
“Rural families in China widely use small-scale biogas digesters for cooking.These digesters employ organic waste to generate biogas for domestic cooking purposes [171].”
From Anaerobic digestion of agricultural waste for biogas production and sustainable bioenergy recovery: a review (2024) · cites this paper as [171]
Citations
Cites
The Lancet Commission on pollution and health
Landrigan, P. J., Fuller, R., Acosta, N. J. R., Adeyi, O., Arnold, R., Basu, N. (., Baldé, A. B., Bertollini, R., Bose-O'Reilly, S., Boufford, J. I., et al. (2018) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(17)32345-0 · Cited by 4,929
Biogas: Developments and perspectives in Europe
Scarlat, N., Dallemand, J.-F., & Fahl, F. (2018) · Renewable Energy · doi:10.1016/j.renene.2018.03.006 · Cited by 1,343
Production of bioenergy and biochemicals from industrial and agricultural wastewater
Angenent, L. T., Karim, K., Al‐Dahhan, M. H., Wrenn, B. A., & Domíguez-Espinosa, R. (2004) · Trends in biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.tibtech.2004.07.001 · Cited by 1,030
Kafle, G. K., & Chen, L. (2015) · Waste Management · doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2015.10.021 · Cited by 491
Pretreatment of agricultural biomass for anaerobic digestion: Current state and challenges
Paudel, S. R., Banjara, S. P., Choi, O. K., Park, K. Y., Kim, Y. M., & Lee, J. W. (2017) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2017.08.182 · Cited by 381
Co-digestion of food waste and sewage sludge for methane production: Current status and perspective
Mehariya, S., Patel, A. K., Karthikeyan, O. P., Elumalai, P., & Wong, J. W. C. (2018) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2018.04.030 · Cited by 363
A spatial analysis of biogas potential from manure in Europe
Scarlat, N., Fahl, F., Dallemand, J.-F., Monforti-Ferrario, F., & Motola, V. (2018) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2018.06.035 · Cited by 342
Environmental sustainability tools in the biofuel industry
Rosen, M. A. (2018) · Biofuel Research Journal · doi:10.18331/brj2018.5.1.2 · Cited by 244
Development of renewable energy in Australia and China: A comparison of policies and status
Hua, Y., Oliphant, M., & Hu, E. J. (2015) · Renewable Energy · doi:10.1016/j.renene.2015.07.060 · Cited by 221
Energy, energy efficiency, and the built environment
Wilkinson, P., Smith, K. R., Beevers, S. D., Tonne, C. C., & Oreszczyn, T. (2007) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(07)61255-0 · Cited by 188
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Li, 2018, Analysis of the policy impact on China's biogas industry development [in Chinese], China Biogas, 36, 3
- Hui, 2018, Comparative analysis on the development process of China-Germany biogas project [in Chinese], China Biogas, 36, 101
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Biogas: Production, properties, applications, economic and challenges: A review
Jameel, M. K., Mustafa, M. A., Ahmed, H. S., Mohammed, A. J., Ghazy, H., Shakir, M. N., Lawas, A. M., Mohammed, S. K., Idan, A. H., Mahmoud, Z. H., et al. (2024) · Results in Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.rechem.2024.101549 · Cited by 304
A critical review of biogas production and usage with legislations framework across the globe
Abanades, S., Abbaspour, H., Ahmadi, A., Das, B., Ehyaei, M. A., Esmaeilion, F., El Haj Assad, M., Hajilounezhad, T., Jamali, D. H., Hmida, A., et al. (2022) · International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology · doi:10.1007/s13762-021-03301-6 · Cited by 292
Obaideen, K., Abdelkareem, M. A., Wilberforce, T., Elsaid, K., Sayed, E. T., Maghrabie, H. M., & Olabi, A. G. (2022) · Journal of the Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers · doi:10.1016/j.jtice.2022.104207 · Cited by 279
Critical review of biochemical pathways to transformation of waste and biomass into bioenergy
Manikandan, S., Vickram, S., Sirohi, R., Subbaiya, R., Krishnan, R. Y., Karmegam, N., Sumathijones, C., Rajagopal, R., Chang, S. W., Ravindran, B., et al. (2023) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2023.128679 · Cited by 268
Alengebawy, A., Ran, Y., Osman, A. I., Jin, K., Samer, M., & Ai, P. (2024) · Environmental Chemistry Letters · doi:10.1007/s10311-024-01789-1 · Cited by 247
“These digesters employ organic waste to generate biogas for domestic cooking purposes [171].”
Influential
Metadata
- Authors
- Xue, S., Song, J., Wang, X., Shang, Z., Sheng, C., Li, C., Zhu, Y., & Liu, J.
- Affiliations
- Northwest A&F University (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Wang, Xiaojiao
- Venue
- Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-01
- Volume
- 117
- Pages
- 109474
- ISSN
- 1364-0321 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2981718488
- Cited by
- 142
- References
- 30
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 20
- FWCI
- 12.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2016T90950, 2015M582708)
- Northwest A and F University
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (41871205, 51508467)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Bioeconomy and Sustainability Development
- Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Renewable energy and sustainable power systems
- Keywords
- biogas industry, biogas policy, China-Europe comparison, biomass resources, household biogas digesters, biogas power generation, biogas subsidies, renewable energy policy, greenhouse gas emissions reduction, agricultural and rural development
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review