Cited by 115Thermochemical Biomass Conversion ProcessesAlgal biology and biofuel productionCatalysis and Hydrodesulfurization Studies

Recent development of hydrothermal liquefaction for algal biorefinery

Open access
Gu, X., Martinez-Fernandez, J.S., Pang, N., Fu, X., Chen, S.·2020·Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.rser.2020.109707

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Conventional HTL is unsuitable for high value product recovery but this could be overcome using a two-stage sequential hydrothermal liquefaction (SEQHTL) process which operates at reduced temperature and pressure to aid recovery of thermolabile products prior to generating bio-oil.

    “The conventional HTL is unsuitable for high value product recovery but this could be overcome using a two-stage sequential hydrothermal liquefaction (SEQHTL) process which operates at reduced temperature and pressure to aid recovery of thermolabile products prior to generating bio-oil [108].”

    From Key Targets for Improving Algal Biofuel Production (2021) · cites this paper as [108]

  • Different approaches are discussed in recent scientific literature to improve economic issues, such as using co-HTL to cover algal reduced productivity in colder seasons or algal cultivation costs and previously extracting valuable compounds from algae then converting residual biomass into biofuel.

    “Different approaches are also discussed in the recent scientific literature and aim to improve the economic issues, such as using the co-HTL process to cover algal reduced productivity in colder seasons [87, 88] or algal cultivation costs [89] and previously extracting valuable compounds from the algae and then converting the residual biomass into biofuel [90–92].”
  • Other studies focus on TEA and LCA for different scenarios to conciliate biorefinery approaches and improve the viability of algae to biofuel production in environmental, economic, and technological aspects.

    “Other studies also focus on TEA and LCA for different scenarios to conciliate biorefinery approaches and to improve the viability of algae to biofuel production in terms of environment, economics, and technology aspects [91, 106, 108, 111].”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 186 · Cited by 115

Authors
Gu, X., Martinez-Fernandez, J. S., Pang, N., Fu, X., & Chen, S.
Affiliations
Washington State University (US)
Corresponding author
Chen, S.
Venue
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-04
Volume
121
Pages
109707
ISSN
1364-0321 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3000107189
Cited by
115
References
186
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 12
FWCI
5.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews (acceptedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Agriculture
  • National Institute of Food and Agriculture (# WNP0002)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Algal biology and biofuel production
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Catalysis and Hydrodesulfurization Studies
Keywords
hydrothermal liquefaction, algal biorefinery, microalgal biomass, bio-oil, bioactive compounds, reaction mechanism, techno-economic analysis, life cycle assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review