Recent development of hydrothermal liquefaction for algal biorefinery
Open accessIntegrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Conventional HTL is unsuitable for high value product recovery but this could be overcome using a two-stage sequential hydrothermal liquefaction (SEQHTL) process which operates at reduced temperature and pressure to aid recovery of thermolabile products prior to generating bio-oil.
“The conventional HTL is unsuitable for high value product recovery but this could be overcome using a two-stage sequential hydrothermal liquefaction (SEQHTL) process which operates at reduced temperature and pressure to aid recovery of thermolabile products prior to generating bio-oil [108].”
From Key Targets for Improving Algal Biofuel Production (2021) · cites this paper as [108]
Different approaches are discussed in recent scientific literature to improve economic issues, such as using co-HTL to cover algal reduced productivity in colder seasons or algal cultivation costs and previously extracting valuable compounds from algae then converting residual biomass into biofuel.
“Different approaches are also discussed in the recent scientific literature and aim to improve the economic issues, such as using the co-HTL process to cover algal reduced productivity in colder seasons [87, 88] or algal cultivation costs [89] and previously extracting valuable compounds from the algae and then converting the residual biomass into biofuel [90–92].”
From Research Progress, Trends, and Future Prospects on Hydrothermal Liquefaction of Algae for Biocrude Production: A Bibliometric Analysis (2024) · cites this paper as [91]
Other studies focus on TEA and LCA for different scenarios to conciliate biorefinery approaches and improve the viability of algae to biofuel production in environmental, economic, and technological aspects.
“Other studies also focus on TEA and LCA for different scenarios to conciliate biorefinery approaches and to improve the viability of algae to biofuel production in terms of environment, economics, and technology aspects [91, 106, 108, 111].”
From Research Progress, Trends, and Future Prospects on Hydrothermal Liquefaction of Algae for Biocrude Production: A Bibliometric Analysis (2024) · cites this paper as [91]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 186 · Cited by 115
- Authors
- Gu, X., Martinez-Fernandez, J. S., Pang, N., Fu, X., & Chen, S.
- Affiliations
- Washington State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Chen, S.
- Venue
- Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-04
- Volume
- 121
- Pages
- 109707
- ISSN
- 1364-0321 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3000107189
- Cited by
- 115
- References
- 186
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 12
- FWCI
- 5.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews (acceptedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- U.S. Department of Agriculture
- National Institute of Food and Agriculture (# WNP0002)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
- Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Algal biology and biofuel production
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Catalysis and Hydrodesulfurization Studies
- Keywords
- hydrothermal liquefaction, algal biorefinery, microalgal biomass, bio-oil, bioactive compounds, reaction mechanism, techno-economic analysis, life cycle assessment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review