CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 130

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Community energy business model evolution: A review of solar photovoltaic developments in England

Nolden, C., Barnes, J., Nicholls, J.·2020·Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2020.109722
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.rser.2020.109722

Cites

Statistics

Figures

Image 1
CC-BY-NC-ND · From the PDF
Figure 2 New community projects per year and cumulative community PV generation capacity in England
Figure 2 New community projects per year and cumulative community PV generation capacity in EnglandCC-BY-NC-ND · From the PDF
Figure 3 Timeline of direct government support programmes and archetypal CE business models identified (authors' own figure)
Figure 3 Timeline of direct government support programmes and archetypal CE business models identified (authors' own figure)CC-BY-NC-ND · From the PDF
Figure 4 CE business model archetype based on grant funding
Figure 4 CE business model archetype based on grant fundingCC-BY-NC-ND · From the PDF
Figure 5 Small project CE business model archetype based on FIT finance
Figure 5 Small project CE business model archetype based on FIT financeCC-BY-NC-ND · From the PDF
Figure 6 CE PPA archetype business model supported by FITs finance
Figure 6 CE PPA archetype business model supported by FITs financeCC-BY-NC-ND · From the PDF
Figure 7 The evolution of English CE business models from saving and grant-based through subsidy to contract and revenue-based business models
Figure 7 The evolution of English CE business models from saving and grant-based through subsidy to contract and revenue-based business modelsCC-BY-NC-ND · From the PDF
Figure 8 An intermediary-facilitated CE business model archetype
Figure 8 An intermediary-facilitated CE business model archetypeCC-BY-NC-ND · From the PDF

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 35

  1. Herbes, 2017, Responding to policy change: new business models for renewable energy cooperatives – barriers perceived by cooperatives' members, Energy Pol, 109, 82, 10.1016/j.enpol.2017.06.051 · DOI
  2. Nolden, 2013, Governing community energy—feed-in tariffs and the development of community wind energy schemes in the United Kingdom and Germany, Energy Pol, 63, 543, 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.08.050 · DOI
  3. Bauwens, 2016, What drives the development of community energy in Europe? the case of wind power cooperatives, Energy Res Soc Sci, 13, 136, 10.1016/j.erss.2015.12.016 · DOI
  4. Huybrechts, 2014, The relevance of the cooperative model in the field of renewable energy, Ann Public Coop Econ, 85, 193, 10.1111/apce.12038 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Hall, 2016, Financing the civic energy sector: how financial institutions affect ownership models in Germany and the United Kingdom, Energy Res Soc Sci, 12, 5, 10.1016/j.erss.2015.11.004 · DOI
  6. Hargreaves, 2013, Grassroots innovations in community energy: the role of intermediaries in niche development, Global Environ Change, 23, 868, 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.02.008 · DOI
  7. Seyfang, 2014, A grassroots sustainable energy niche? Reflections on community energy in the UK, Environ Innov Soc Transit, 13, 21, 10.1016/j.eist.2014.04.004 · DOI
  8. Smith, 2016, Making the most of community energies: three perspectives on grassroots innovation, Environ Plan A, 48, 407, 10.1177/0308518X15597908 · DOI
  9. Ornetzeder, 2013, Of solar collectors, wind power, and car sharing: comparing and understanding successful cases of grassroots innovations, Global Environ Change, 23, 856, 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.12.007 · DOI
  10. Walker, 2007, Carbon reduction, ‘the public’ and renewable energy: engaging with socio-technical configurations, Area, 39, 458, 10.1111/j.1475-4762.2007.00772.x · DOI
  11. de Vries, 2015, User-led innovation in civic energy communities, Environ Innov Soc Transit
  12. Barnes, 2018, The local embedding of low carbon technologies and the agency of user-side intermediaries, J Clean Prod, 209, 769, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.258 · DOI
  13. Walker, 2008, Community renewable energy: what should it mean?, Energy Pol, 36, 497, 10.1016/j.enpol.2007.10.019 · DOI
  14. Brummer, 2018, Community energy – benefits and barriers: a comparative literature review of Community Energy in the UK, Germany and the USA, the benefits it provides for society and the barriers it faces, Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 94, 187, 10.1016/j.rser.2018.06.013 · DOI
  15. Smith, 2013, Spaces for sustainable innovation: solar photovoltaic electricity in the UK, Technol Forecast Soc Change, 81, 115, 10.1016/j.techfore.2013.02.001 · DOI
  16. Polzin, 2016, What encourages local authorities to engage with energy performance contracting for retrofitting - evidence from German municipalities, Energy Pol, 94, 317, 10.1016/j.enpol.2016.03.049 · DOI
  17. Nolden, 2016, Catalysing the energy service market: the role of intermediaries, Energy Pol, 98, 420, 10.1016/j.enpol.2016.08.041 · DOI
  18. Rindfleisch, 1997, Transaction cost analysis: past, present, and future applications, J Market, 61, 30, 10.1177/002224299706100403 · DOI
  19. Sorrell, 2007, The economics of energy service contracts, Energy Pol, 35, 507, 10.1016/j.enpol.2005.12.009 · DOI
  20. El Chaar, 2011, Review of photovoltaic technologies, Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 15, 2165, 10.1016/j.rser.2011.01.004 · DOI
  21. Huijben, 2016, Mainstreaming solar: stretching the regulatory regime through business model innovation, Environ Innov Soc Transit, 20, 1, 10.1016/j.eist.2015.12.002 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Lovins, 1976, Energy strategy: the road not taken?, Foreign Aff, 65, 10.2307/20039628 · DOI
  23. Walker, 2007, Harnessing community energies: explaining and evaluating community-based localism in renewable energy policy in the UK, Global Environ Polit, 7, 64, 10.1162/glep.2007.7.2.64 · DOI
  24. Karneyeva, 2017, Solar feed-in tariffs in a post-grid parity world: the role of risk, investor diversity and business models, Energy Pol, 106, 445, 10.1016/j.enpol.2017.04.005 · DOI
  25. Seyfang, 2013, A thousand flowers blooming? An examination of community energy in the UK, Energy Pol, 61, 977, 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.06.030 · DOI
  26. Hobson, 2014, Monitoring and evaluation in UK low-carbon community groups: benefits, barriers and the politics of the local, Local Environ, 1
  27. Rogers, 2008, Public perceptions of opportunities for community-based renewable energy projects, Energy Pol, 36, 4217, 10.1016/j.enpol.2008.07.028 · DOI
  28. Martiskainen, 2015, ‘Pro-savers’: the role of community in energy demand reduction, ECEEE Summer Study Proc, 2039
  29. Lockwood, 2016, The UK's Levy Control Framework for renewable electricity support: effects and significance, Energy Pol, 97, 193, 10.1016/j.enpol.2016.07.026 · DOI
  30. Parag, 2016, Electricity market design for the prosumer era, Nat Energy, 1, 16032, 10.1038/nenergy.2016.32 · DOI
  31. Parkinson, 2018, Angry and frustrated, more customers are quitting the grid, Renew Econ
  32. Pearce, 2018, Feed-in tariffs for solar microgeneration: policy evaluation and capacity projections using a realistic agent-based model, Energy Pol, 116, 95, 10.1016/j.enpol.2018.01.060 · DOI
  33. Hargreaves, 2013, Grassroots innovations in community energy: the role of intermediaries in niche development, Global Environ Change, 23, 868, 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.02.008 · DOI
  34. Bird, 2014, Scaling up community activism: the role of intermediaries in collective approaches to community energy, People, Place Pol Online, 8, 208, 10.3351/ppp.0008.0003.0006 · DOI
  35. Brown, 2018, Business models for residential retrofit in the United Kingdom; a critical assessment of 5 key archetypes, Energy Effic, 2, 1

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Nolden, C., Barnes, J., & Nicholls, J.
Venue
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-04
Volume
122
Pages
109722
ISSN
1364-0321
DOI
10.1016/j.rser.2020.109722
Cited by
130
References
0
Language
en
Licence
Funders
  • Economic and Social Research Council
  • University of Exeter

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review