Cited by 224Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas ProductionComposting and Vermicomposting TechniquesBiofuel production and bioconversion

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 201 of the 203 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Anaerobic digestion of food waste for bio-energy production in China and Southeast Asia: A review

Open access
Negri, Camilla, Ricci, Marina, Zilio, Massimo, D'Imporzano, Giuliana, Qiao, Wei, Dong, Renjie, Adani, Fabrizio·2020·Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.rser.2020.110138

Cites

201 of 201 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Items 201–201 of 201

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 203 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Gonzalez-Perez, 2016, Climate change and the 2030 corporate agenda for sustainable development BT - climate change and the 2030 corporate agenda for sustainable development, Clim. Chang. 2030 Corp. Agenda Sustain. Dev., 1
  2. Fisgativa, 2015, TD-O_06 Influence of food waste characteristics on treatability through anaerobic digestion, Ramiran, 2015, 481
  3. Lemus, 2002, Biodegradation of lipidic compounds in synthetic food wastes during composting, Can Biosyst Eng, 44, 6
  4. Zhang, 2007, Characterization of food waste as feedstock for anaerobic digestion, Bioresour Technol, 98, 929, 10.1016/j.biortech.2006.02.039 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Labatut, 2011, Biochemical methane potential and biodegradability of complex organic substrates, Bioresour Technol, 102, 2255, 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.10.035 · DOI
  6. Croce, 2016, Anaerobic digestion of straw and corn stover: the effect of biological process optimization and pre-treatment on total bio-methane yield and energy performance, Biotechnol Adv, 34, 1289, 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2016.09.004 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 224

Metadata

Authors
Negri, C., Ricci, M., Zilio, M., D'Imporzano, G., Qiao, W., Dong, R., & Adani, F.
Affiliations
  • University of Milan (IT)
  • National Development and Reform Commission (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Qiao, Wei
  • Adani, Fabrizio
Venue
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-11
Volume
133
Pages
110138
ISSN
1364-0321 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3046773200
Cited by
223
References
203
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 36 · 2024: 39 · 2023: 46 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 41 · 2020: 4
FWCI
2.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • Archivio Istituzionale della Ricerca (Universita Degli Studi Di Milano) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China (SQ2013ZOA000017)
  • Beijing Municipal Natural Science Foundation (6182017)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Composting and Vermicomposting Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Biofuel production and bioconversion
Keywords
anaerobic digestion, food waste, biogas production, bioenergy, co-digestion, food waste pretreatment, thermal pretreatment, physical pretreatment, energy crops, techno-economic analysis, source separation, circular economy, China, Southeast Asia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review