Cited by 219Climate Change Policy and EconomicsEnergy, Environment, Economic GrowthClimate Change and Sustainable Development

A review of successful climate change mitigation policies in major emitting economies and the potential of global replication

Open access
Fekete, Hanna, Kuramochi, Takeshi, Roelfsema, Mark, Elzen, Michel den, Forsell, Nicklas, Höhne, Niklas, Luna, Lisa, Hans, Frederic +5 more·2021·Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews

Abstract

This article reviews climate change mitigation policies implemented in five major emitting economies: China, the European Union, India, Japan and the United States. It analyses their historical performance in terms of energy system and greenhouse gas emissions indicators. In cases where policies aim to reduce future emissions, their target performance levels are assessed. The review centres on the sectors of electricity generation, passenger vehicles, freight transport, forestry, industry, buildings, agriculture, and oil and gas production. Most focus countries have implemented successful policies for renewable energy, fuel efficiency, electrification of passenger vehicles, and forestry. For other sectors, information is limited or very heterogeneous (e.g. buildings, appliances, agriculture) or there are few comprehensive policies in place (e.g. industry). The article further presents an explorative emissions scenario developed under the assumption that all countries will replicate both the observed trends in sector-level indicators and the trends that policies for future emissions reductions aspire to achieve. It shows that the global replication of sector progress would reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 2030 by about 20% compared to a current policies scenario. All countries analysed would overachieve the emissions reduction targets in their post-2020 climate targets. However, the resulting reduction in global emissions by 2030 would still not be sufficient to keep the world on track for a global cost-effective pathway that keeps temperature increase below 2°C. The findings of this study emphasise the need for transformative policies to keep the Paris Agreement temperature limit within reach.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.rser.2020.110602

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 54 · Cited by 219

Research works printed but not linked: 18

  1. UNFCCC. Paris agreement -decision 1/CP.21 -report of the conference of the Parties on its twenty-first session, held in Paris from 30 november to 13 december 2015 addendum part two: action taken by the conference of the Parties at its twenty-first session. Bonn, Germany: United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change; 2015.
  2. UNEP. Emissions gap report 2019. Nairobi, Kenya: United Nations Environment Programme; 2019. https://doi.org/10.18356/ff6d1a84-en. · DOI
  3. IEA. CO 2 missions from fuel combustion 2017 -highlights. vol. 1. Paris, France: International Energy Agency; 2017.
  4. Cd-Links. WP2.1 Review of national action plans and development policies, including their influence on GHG emissions and development objectives. As input to the CD-LINKS WP3 Global low-carbon development pathways. Protocol second round -July 2018. CD-LINKS. 2018.
  5. METI, MOEJ. "Tokyo denryoku no karyokudengen nyuusatsu ni kansuru kankei kyokuchoukyuu kaigi torimatome" (Summary report of the director-general level conference concerning the Bids on Thermal Power Generation Facilities of TEPCO). Tokyo, Japan: Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry, and the Ministry of the Environment; 2013.
  6. Kanden Energy Solution. Press release (23 March, 2017). Cancellation of the coal- fired power plant construction project in Ichihara, Chiba. In Japanese. 2017. htt p://www.kenes.jp/topics/topics032.html. [Accessed 5 March 2018].
  7. MOEJ. Submission of the opinion by the Minister of the Environment on the environmental impact assessment draft report on the Misumi no.2 power plant. In Japanese. 2018. https://www.env.go.jp/press/104893.html. [Accessed 5 March 2018].
  8. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Oil and natural gas sector: emission standards for new, reconstructed, and modified sources review. Federal Register; 2019.
  9. GPO. Federal register/vol. 81, No.223/friday, november 18, 2016/rules and regulations. 43 CFR parts 3100, 3160 and 3170 [17X.LLWO310000.L13100000. PP0000] RIN 1004-AE14. Waste prevention, production subject to royalties, and resource conservation. The United States of America: Government Publishing Office; 2016.
  10. European Parliament. Directive 2012/27/EU of the European parliament and of the Council of 25 october 2012 on energy efficiency. 2012. https://doi.org/ 10.3000/19770677.L_2012.315.eng. · DOI
  11. Siderius PJS, Nakagami H. A MEPS is a MEPS is a MEPS: comparing Ecodesign and Top Runner schemes for setting product efficiency standards, vol. 5; 2012.
  12. Chowdhury MA. Strategies of the next generation vehicles (NGV) in Japan. Journal of Law and Political Science 2019;46:235-67.
  13. IEA. Global EV Outlook 2017: two million and counting. Paris, France: International Energy Agency; 2017. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264278882- en. · DOI
  14. UNEP. Bridging the gap -enhancing mitigation ambition and action at G20 level and globally -pre-release version of a chapter in the forthcoming UNEP emissions gap report 2019. Nairobi, Kenya: United Nations Environment Programme; 2019.
  15. U.S. EPA, U.S. DOT. Greenhouse gas emissions and fuel efficiency standards for medium-and heavy-duty engines and vehicles -phase 2, vol. 81. Washington DC, USA: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, U.S. Department of Transportation; 2016.
  16. Official Journal of the European Union. Regulation No 517/2014 of the European Parliament and of the council of 16 April 2014 on fluorinated greenhouse gases and repealing Regulation (EC) No 842/2006 (Text with EEA relevance). European Union; 2014.
  17. METI. Collection of reports under article 3 of the supplementary provisions of the Act partially amending the Act on the protection of the ozone layer through the control of specified substances and other measures. Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry; 2018. https://www.meti.go.jp/english/press/2018/0710_002.html. [Accessed 22 June 2020].
  18. FFTC-AP. Rice policy review in Vietnam. FFTC Agricultural Policy Platform; 2015. http://ap.fftc.agnet.org/ap_db.php?id=406. [Accessed 12 April 2018].

Authors
Fekete, H., Kuramochi, T., Roelfsema, M., Elzen, M. D., Forsell, N., Höhne, N., Luna, L., Hans, F., Sterl, S., Olivier, J., van Soest, H., Frank, S., & Gusti, M.
Affiliations
  • NewClimate Institute (DE)
  • Utrecht University (NL)
  • Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency (NL)
  • International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (AT)
  • University of Potsdam (DE)
  • Vrije Universiteit Brussel (BE)
Corresponding author
  • Fekete, Hanna
  • Kuramochi, Takeshi
Venue
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-03
Volume
137
Pages
110602
ISSN
1364-0321 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3112814935
Cited by
219
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 27 · 2025: 44 · 2024: 50 · 2023: 46 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 21 · 2013: 1
FWCI
20.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Lirias (KU Leuven) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • IIASA PURE (International Institute of Applied Systems Analysis) (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • publish.UP (University of Potsdam) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • VU Research Portal (submittedVersion)
  • VUBIR (Vrije Universiteit Brussel) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Horizon 2020
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Climate Change Policy and Economics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate Change and Sustainable Development
Keywords
climate change mitigation policy, greenhouse gas emissions, policy replication, renewable energy policy, fuel economy, vehicle electrification, forest policy, emission scenarios, 2°C target, Paris Agreement, China, European Union, India, Japan, United States, energy systems, transport emissions, industrial emissions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review