The DOI matches its Crossref record; 180 of the 180 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A comprehensive review on anaerobic digestion of organic fraction of municipal solid waste
Open accessAbstract
Abstract This article aims to comprehensively review the anaerobic digestion (AD) process utilising the organic fraction of municipal solid waste (OFMSW) substrate. The AD of OFMSW has received considerable attention due to its significant energy and nutrient recovery as well as its greenhouse gas (GHG) mitigation potential. AD is a biological process involving treating and stabilising organic matter in the absence of oxygen accomplished by a consortium of microorganisms and occurs under hydrolysis, acidogenesis, acetogenesis, and methanogenesis phases. The hydrolysis phase is recognised as the primary rate-limiting step. Thus, exploring the ways to speed up the hydrolysis process will maximise biogas production. The key factors affecting the digestion efficiency include feedstock quality, pre-treatment process, design and selection of digestion process and process conditions including pH, temperature, carbon to nitrogen (C: N) ratio, organic loading rate and hydraulic retention time. The review reveals that solid-state anaerobic digestion (SSAD) is best suited for OFMSW due to its high solid concentration (>15%) and better process performance. The continuous digestion with thermophilic temperatures was found to be the best condition for high solid AD process. The plug flow and continuous stir tank reactors were the best performing options to control the biological conditions for the digestate post-treatment. Proper selection of the parameters for the whole process is crucial in ensuring process feasibility and economic sustainability of AD of OFMSW. The study revealed that the AD of OFMSW could play a significant role to mitigate waste and waste-related problems.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
1 retracted
Microbial Ecology of Anaerobic Digesters: The Key Players of Anaerobiosis
Ali Shah, F., Mahmood, Q., Maroof Shah, M., Pervez, A., & Ahmad Asad, S. (2014) · The Scientific World Journal · doi:10.1155/2014/183752 · Cited by 345
RetractedLignin Biosynthesis and Structure
Vanholme, R., Demedts, B., Morreel, K., Ralph, J., & Boerjan, W. (2010) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.110.155119 · Cited by 2,664
Review on research achievements of biogas from anaerobic digestion
Mao, C., Feng, Y., Wang, X., & Ren, G. (2015) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2015.02.032 · Cited by 1,766
Biogas upgrading and utilization: Current status and perspectives
Angelidaki, I., Treu, L., Tsapekos, P., Luo, G., Campanaro, S., Wenzel, H., & Kougias, P. G. (2018) · Biotechnology Advances · doi:10.1016/j.biotechadv.2018.01.011 · Cited by 1,426
Techniques for transformation of biogas to biomethane
Ryckebosch, E., Drouillon, M., & Vervaeren, H. (2011) · Biomass and Bioenergy · doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2011.02.033 · Cited by 1,348
Effects of anaerobic digestion on digestate nutrient availability and crop growth: A review
Möller, K., & Müller, T. (2012) · Engineering in Life Sciences · doi:10.1002/elsc.201100085 · Cited by 1,339
Solid-state anaerobic digestion for methane production from organic waste
Li, Y., Park, S. Y., & Zhu, J. (2011) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2010.07.042 · Cited by 1,069
Characterization of food waste as feedstock for anaerobic digestion
ZHANG, R., ELMASHAD, H., HARTMAN, K., WANG, F., LIU, G., CHOATE, C., & GAMBLE, P. (2007) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2006.02.039 · Cited by 1,033
Pretreatment methods to enhance anaerobic digestion of organic solid waste
Ariunbaatar, J., Panico, A., Esposito, G., Pirozzi, F., & Lens, P. N. L. (2014) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.02.035 · Cited by 930
Sun, Q., Li, H., Yan, J., Liu, L., Yu, Z., & Yu, X. (2015) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2015.06.029 · Cited by 924
Cited by
A critical review on sustainable management and resource utilization of digestate
Guan, D., Zhao, J., Wang, Y., Fu, Z., Zhang, D., Zhang, H., Xie, J., Sun, Y., Zhu, J., & Wang, D. (2024) · Process Safety and Environmental Protection · doi:10.1016/j.psep.2024.01.029 · Cited by 82
Saravanan, A., Kumar, P. S., Nhung, T. C., Ramesh, B., Srinivasan, S., & Rangasamy, G. (2022) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.136630 · Cited by 70
Metadata
- Authors
- Zamri, M. F. M. A., Hasmady, S., Akhiar, A., Ideris, F., Shamsuddin, A. H., Mofijur, M., Fattah, I. M. R., & Mahlia, T. M. I.
- Venue
- Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-03
- Volume
- 137
- Pages
- 110637
- ISSN
- 1364-0321 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3112959746
- Cited by
- 454
- References
- 180
- FWCI
- 26.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A comprehensive review on anaerobic digestion of organic fraction of municipal solid waste. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.rser.2020.110637
- The paper
- Zamri, M. F. M. A., Hasmady, S., Akhiar, A., Ideris, F., Shamsuddin, A. H., Mofijur, M., Fattah, I. M. R., & Mahlia, T. M. I. (2021). A comprehensive review on anaerobic digestion of organic fraction of municipal solid waste. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2020.110637
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.