Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 267

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 86 of the 86 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Machine learning methods for modelling the gasification and pyrolysis of biomass and waste

Open access
Ascher, Simon, Watson, Ian, You, Siming·2022·Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews

Abstract

Over the past two decades, the use of machine learning (ML) methods to model biomass and waste gasification/pyrolysis has increased rapidly. Only 70 papers were published in the 2000s compared to a total of 549 publications in the 2010s. However, the approaches and findings have yet to be systematically reviewed. In this work, the machine learning methods most commonly employed for modelling gasification and pyrolysis processes are discussed with reference to their applications, merits, and limitations. Whilst coefficients of determination (R 2 ) can be difficult to compare directly, due to some studies having vastly different approaches and aims, it has generally been found that most studies consistently achieved a high prediction accuracy with R 2 > 0.90. Artificial neural networks have been most widely used due to their potential to learn highly non-linear input-output relationships. However, a variety of methods (e.g. regression methods, tree-based methods, and support vector machines) are appropriate depending on the application, data availability, model speed, etc. It is concluded that ML has great potential for the development of models with greater accuracy. Some advantages of machine learning models over existing models are their ability to incorporate relevant non-numerical parameters and the power to generate a multitude of solutions for a wide range of input parameters. More emphasis should be placed on model interpretability in order to better understand the processes being studied.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.rser.2021.111902

Cites

86 of 86 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 86 references

Cited by

See all 267

Metadata

Authors
Ascher, S., Watson, I., & You, S.
Venue
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-03
Volume
155
Pages
111902
ISSN
1364-0321 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3211431567
Cited by
267
References
86
FWCI
10.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Machine learning methods for modelling the gasification and pyrolysis of biomass and waste. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.rser.2021.111902
The paper
Ascher, S., Watson, I., & You, S. (2022). Machine learning methods for modelling the gasification and pyrolysis of biomass and waste. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.111902

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.