Cited by 189Algal biology and biofuel productionAquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton DynamicsAquaculture Nutrition and Growth

A Comparison between Microalgal Autotrophic Growth and Metabolite Accumulation with Heterotrophic, Mixotrophic and Photoheterotrophic Cultivation Modes

Abreu, Ana P., Morais, Rui C., Teixeira, José A., Nunes, João·2022·Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.rser.2022.112247

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The availability of organic carbon is generally not a limiting factor for the autotrophic growth of microalgae. In heterotrophic or mixotrophic culture systems, however, it can be a decisive limiting factor.

    “In contrast to nitrogen and phosphorus, the availability of organic carbon is generally not a limiting factor for the autotrophic growth of microalgae. In heterotrophic or mixotrophic culture systems, however, it can be a decisive limiting factor [122].”
  • Commercial viability of using Chlorella sp. and Spirulina (Arthrospira) sp. biomass as a source of valuable products still encounters economic challenges.

    “Despite the considerable potential applications and research efforts, the commercial viability of using Chlorella sp. and Spirulina (Arthrospira) sp. biomass as a source of valuable products still encounters economic challenges due to several issues.”
  • Cultivation of Chlorella sp. and Spirulina (Arthrospira) sp. does not compete with terrestrial crops for arable land, and it can be efficiently carried out using water recirculation or even wastewaters.

    “Notably, their cultivation does not compete with terrestrial crops for arable land, and it can be efficiently carried out using water recirculation or even wastewaters [1,52].”
  • The main concern for commercial viability is the low biomass productivity achieved even under optimized growth conditions.

    “The main concern is the low biomass productivity achieved even under optimized growth conditions [1].”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 209 · Cited by 189

Authors
Abreu, A. P., Morais, R. C., Teixeira, J. A., & Nunes, J.
Affiliations
University of Minho (PT)
Corresponding author
Abreu, Ana P.
Venue
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-05
Volume
159
Pages
112247
ISSN
1364-0321 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4213079423
Cited by
189
References
209
Citations by year
2026: 39 · 2025: 63 · 2024: 52 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 11
FWCI
6.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • RepositóriUM (Universidade do Minho) (submittedVersion)
  • Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Algal biology and biofuel production
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Aquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Aquatic Science › Aquaculture Nutrition and Growth
Keywords
microalgae cultivation, autotrophic growth, heterotrophic cultivation, mixotrophic cultivation, organic carbon substrates, biomass productivity, metabolite accumulation, cultivation parameters, photosynthetic efficiency

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review