The DOI matches its Crossref record; 193 of the 193 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Carbon capture utilization and storage in review: Sociotechnical implications for a carbon reliant world
Open accessAbstract
The decarbonization of industry and industrial systems is a pressing challenge given the relative lack of low-carbon options available for “hard to decarbonize” sectors such as steelmaking, cement manufacturing, and chemical production. Carbon capture utilization and storage (CCUS) represents a promising and crosscutting solution to this formidable problem. This review takes a systematic and sociotechnical perspective to examine how CCUS can support industrial decarbonization and relevant associated technical, economic, and social factors. This includes a focus on the energy and climate impacts of carbon emitting activities, the role, and options for CCUS in global responses to climate change, technical aspects of capture, transport, storage, and utilization, as well as policy implications and areas requiring further research. In doing so, the Review examines hundreds of published studies on the topic over the previous twenty years to offer a state-of-the-art investigation on technical options for capture (including direct air capture), transportation (including pipelines, ships, and rail), storage (including biotic and abiotic), and utilization (including enhanced oil recovery and biochar). The Review also investigates the evidence base within the literature on enablers and barriers to CCUS, policy mechanisms, and international frameworks as well as themes such as geopolitics, trade, and future research gaps. We conclude with insights about future CCUS pathways and sociotechnical systems dynamics.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
IPCC special report on carbon dioxide capture and storage
Metz, B., Davidson, O. R., de Coninck, H., Loos, M., & Meyer, L. (2021) · Cited by 4,875
Analyzing the functional dynamics of technological innovation systems: A scheme of analysis
Bergek, A., Jacobsson, S., Carlsson, B., Lindmark, S., & Rickne, A. (2008) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2007.12.003 · Cited by 2,269
Negative emissions—Part 2: Costs, potentials and side effects
Fuss, S., Lamb, W. F., Callaghan, M. W., Hilaire, J., Creutzig, F., Amann, T., Beringer, T., de Oliveira Garcia, W., Hartmann, J., Khanna, T., et al. (2018) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/aabf9f · Cited by 1,525
Lal, R. (2008) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2007.2185 · Cited by 1,413
Anthropogenic Chemical Carbon Cycle for a Sustainable Future
Olah, G. A., Prakash, G. K. S., & Goeppert, A. (2011) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja202642y · Cited by 1,376
A review of mineral carbonation technologies to sequester CO 2
Sanna, A., Uibu, M., Caramanna, G., Kuusik, R., & Maroto-Valer, M. M. (2014) · Chem. Soc. Rev. · doi:10.1039/c4cs00035h · Cited by 1,258
Techno-economic assessment of CO2 direct air capture plants
Fasihi, M., Efimova, O., & Breyer, C. (2019) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.086 · Cited by 1,171
Earthquake triggering and large-scale geologic storage of carbon dioxide
Zoback, M. D., & Gorelick, S. M. (2012) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1202473109 · Cited by 947
Jacobsson, S. (2004) · Industrial and Corporate Change · doi:10.1093/icc/dth032 · Cited by 876
Committed emissions from existing energy infrastructure jeopardize 1.5 °C climate target
Tong, D., Zhang, Q., Zheng, Y., Caldeira, K., Shearer, C., Hong, C., Qin, Y., & Davis, S. J. (2019) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1364-3 · Cited by 816
Cited by
Joarder, M. S. A., Islam, M. S., Hasan, M. H., Kutub, A., Kabir, M. F., Rashid, F., & Joarder, T. A. (2025) · Environmental Science and Pollution Research · doi:10.1007/s11356-025-36284-9 · Cited by 51
Sahu, S., Kunj, P., Kaur, A., Khatri, M., Singh, G., & Arya, S. K. (2024) · Energy Conversion and Management · doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2024.118467 · Cited by 44
Metadata
- Authors
- McLaughlin, H., Littlefield, A. A., Menefee, M., Kinzer, A., Hull, T., Sovacool, B. K., Bazilian, M. D., Kim, J., & Griffiths, S.
- Venue
- Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2023-05
- Volume
- 177
- Pages
- 113215
- ISSN
- 1364-0321 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4323288669
- Cited by
- 448
- References
- 193
- FWCI
- 44.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Carbon capture utilization and storage in review: Sociotechnical implications for a carbon reliant world. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.rser.2023.113215
- The paper
- McLaughlin, H., Littlefield, A. A., Menefee, M., Kinzer, A., Hull, T., Sovacool, B. K., Bazilian, M. D., Kim, J., & Griffiths, S. (2023). Carbon capture utilization and storage in review: Sociotechnical implications for a carbon reliant world. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2023.113215
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.