The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
Harvesting the sun twice: Energy, food and water benefits from agrivoltaics in East Africa
Open accessAbstract
Food, energy and water insecurity are concomitant challenges facing many communities in East Africa. Agrivoltaic systems – agriculture integrated with photovoltaic panels – address all three challenges, providing low carbon electricity, food production and water conservation on the same land area. Agrivoltaics have proven benefits for the food-energy-water nexus in the USA, Europe and Asia, but research is lacking in sub-Saharan Africa, where energy access remains low, and climate change and water scarcity threaten food systems. This study presents evidence for concomitant electricity generation, food production and water conservation from agrivoltaic systems in Tanzania and Kenya, demonstrating the viability of these systems for both grid-tied agribusinesses and rural, off-grid communities. Performance of some crops improved under agrivoltaics, generating higher incomes for farmers and agribusinesses while reducing energy bills and/or enhancing energy supply. Crop survivability during a warm period was greater under the agrivoltaic system, indicating potential for climate change resilience. Panel shading reduced irrigation demand, thus some crops achieved greater yields while needing less water input. Rainwater harvesting from panel runoff further reduced irrigation needs. Combining energy infrastructure with agriculture enhanced land productivity for all crops at both sites. Agrivoltaics, whether grid-tied or off-grid, could address multiple Sustainable Development Goals in East Africa simultaneously by contributing to energy security, climate change-resilient food production, and water conservation in the region. • Agrivoltaics can generate electricity, improve crop yields, and reduce water loss. • Agrivoltaics can support off-grid electrification in rural East Africa. • Some crop yields and sale values are higher with agrivoltaic systems. • Some crops produce greater yields with less water input. • Land productivity is improved with simultaneous electricity and food production.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 59 · Cited by 54
Research works printed but not linked: 61
- Fuso Nerini, 2018, Mapping synergies and trade-offs between energy and the sustainable development goals, Nat Energy, 3, 10, 10.1038/s41560-017-0036-5 · DOI
- 2020, Access to electricity (% of population), SE4ALL database
- Menéndez, 2013, Energy and socio-economic profile of a small rural community in the highlands of central Tanzania: a case study, Energy Sustain Dev, 17, 201, 10.1016/j.esd.2012.12.002 · DOI
- Szabó, 2011, Energy solutions in rural Africa: mapping electrification costs of distributed solar and diesel generation versus grid extension, Environ Res Lett, 6, 10.1088/1748-9326/6/3/034002 · DOI
- Alstone, 2015, Decentralized energy systems for clean electricity access, Nat Clim Change, 5, 305, 10.1038/nclimate2512 · DOI
- Chisika, 2021, Enhancing sustainable development and regional integration through electrification by solar power: the case of six East African States, Sustainability, 13, 3275, 10.3390/su13063275 · DOI
- Hansen, 2015, Review of solar PV policies, interventions and diffusion in East Africa, Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 46, 236, 10.1016/j.rser.2015.02.046 · DOI
- Nakawuka, 2018, A review of trends, constraints and opportunities of smallholder irrigation in East Africa, Global Food Secur, 17, 196, 10.1016/j.gfs.2017.10.003 · DOI
- Rufino, 2013, Transitions in agro-pastoralist systems of East Africa: impacts on food security and poverty, Agric Ecosyst Environ, 179, 215, 10.1016/j.agee.2013.08.019 · DOI
- Gebre, 2021, Prevalence of household food insecurity in East Africa: linking food access with climate vulnerability, Clim Risk Manag, 33
- Adhikari, 2015, Climate change and eastern Africa: a review of impact on major crops, Food Energy Secur, 4, 110, 10.1002/fes3.61 · DOI
- Sovacool, 2016, Energy decisions reframed as justice and ethical concerns, Nat Energy, 1, 1, 10.1038/nenergy.2016.24 · DOI
- Hernandez, 2014, Environmental impacts of utility-scale solar energy, Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 29, 766, 10.1016/j.rser.2013.08.041 · DOI · Paper page
- Moore-O’Leary, 2017, Sustainability of utility-scale solar energy – critical ecological concepts, Front Ecol Environ, 15, 385, 10.1002/fee.1517 · DOI
- van de Ven, 2021, The potential land requirements and related land use change emissions of solar energy, Sci Rep, 11, 2907, 10.1038/s41598-021-82042-5 · DOI
- Maia, 2020, Photovoltaic panels as shading resources for livestock, J Clean Prod, 258, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120551 · DOI
- Afpa, 2023, Use of solar panels for shade for holstein heifers, Animals, 13, 329, 10.3390/ani13030329 · DOI
- Andrew, 2021, Herbage yield, lamb growth and foraging behavior in agrivoltaic production system, Front Sustain Food Syst, 5, 10.3389/fsufs.2021.659175 · DOI
- Handler, 2022, Greener sheep: life cycle analysis of integrated sheep agrivoltaic systems, Clean Energy Syst, 3
- Barron-Gafford, 2019, Agrivoltaics provide mutual benefits across the food–energy–water nexus in drylands, Nat Sustain, 2, 848, 10.1038/s41893-019-0364-5 · DOI · Paper page
- Marrou, 2013, Productivity and radiation use efficiency of lettuces grown in the partial shade of photovoltaic panels, Eur J Agron, 44, 54, 10.1016/j.eja.2012.08.003 · DOI
- Marrou, 2013, How does a shelter of solar panels influence water flows in a soil–crop system?, Eur J Agron, 50, 38, 10.1016/j.eja.2013.05.004 · DOI
- Malu, 2017, Agrivoltaic potential on grape farms in India, Sustain Energy Technol Assess, 23, 104
- Trommsdorff, 2021, Combining food and energy production: design of an agrivoltaic system applied in arable and vegetable farming in Germany, Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 140, 10.1016/j.rser.2020.110694 · DOI
- Touil, 2021, Shading effect of photovoltaic panels on horticulture crops production: a mini review, Rev Environ Sci Biotechnol, 20, 281, 10.1007/s11157-021-09572-2 · DOI
- Weselek, 2019, Agrophotovoltaic systems: applications, challenges, and opportunities. A review, Agron Sustain Dev, 39, 35, 10.1007/s13593-019-0581-3 · DOI
- Mamun, 2022, A review of research on agrivoltaic systems, Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 161, 10.1016/j.rser.2022.112351 · DOI
- Cinderby, 2024, Harnessing the sun for agriculture: pathways to the successful expansion of Agrivoltaic systems in East Africa, Energy Res Social Sci, 116, 10.1016/j.erss.2024.103657 · DOI
- Ogundari, 2021, The effects of climate change on African agricultural productivity growth revisited, Environ Sci Pollut Res, 28, 30035, 10.1007/s11356-021-12684-5 · DOI
- Dupraz, 2023, Assessment of the ground coverage ratio of agrivoltaic systems as a proxy for potential crop productivity, Agrofor Syst
- Laudien, 2020, Robustly forecasting maize yields in Tanzania based on climatic predictors, Sci Rep, 10, 10.1038/s41598-020-76315-8 · DOI
- Yuan, 2021, Shade stress on maize seedlings biomass production and photosynthetic traits, Ciênc Rural, 52
- Ramos-Fuentes, 2023, Effects of shade and deficit irrigation on maize growth and development in fixed and dynamic AgriVoltaic systems, Agric Water Manag, 280, 10.1016/j.agwat.2023.108187 · DOI
- Dilla, 2019, Tree pruning, zone and fertiliser interactions determine maize productivity in the Faidherbia albida (Delile) A. Chev parkland agroforestry system of Ethiopia, Agrofor Syst, 93, 10.1007/s10457-018-0304-9 · DOI
- Kim, 2023, Effects of climate change and drought tolerance on maize growth, Plants, 12, 3548, 10.3390/plants12203548 · DOI
- Simanjuntak, 2023, Impact of climate extreme events and their causality on maize yield in South Africa, Sci Rep, 13, 10.1038/s41598-023-38921-0 · DOI
- Lin, 2008, Synergies between agricultural intensification and climate change could create surprising vulnerabilities for crops, Bioscience, 58, 847, 10.1641/B580911 · DOI
- Tscharntke, 2011, Multifunctional shade-tree management in tropical agroforestry landscapes – a review, J Appl Ecol, 48, 619, 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2010.01939.x · DOI
- Erwin, 2017, Photosynthetic responses of Swiss chard, kale, and spinach cultivars to irradiance and carbon dioxide concentration, Hortscience, 52, 706, 10.21273/HORTSCI11799-17 · DOI
- Xu, 2023, Effects of transplanting and AMF inoculation on the fruit yield of African eggplants (Solanum aethiopicum and Solanum anguivi) in Tanzania, Front Agron, 5, 10.3389/fagro.2023.1300553 · DOI
- Pouliot, 2012, Testing the shade tolerance of selected crops under Parkia biglobosa (Jacq.) Benth. in an agroforestry parkland in Burkina Faso, West Africa, Agrofor Syst, 85, 477, 10.1007/s10457-011-9411-6 · DOI
- Chalgynbayeva, 2023, Worldwide research trends in agrivoltaic systems—a bibliometric review, Energies, 16, 611, 10.3390/en16020611 · DOI
- Ghosh, 2023, Nexus between agriculture and photovoltaics (agrivoltaics, agriphotovoltaics) for sustainable development goal: a review, Sol Energy, 266, 10.1016/j.solener.2023.112146 · DOI
- Gbegbelegbe, 2018, Smallholder farmers in eastern Africa and climate change: a review of risks and adaptation options with implications for future adaptation programmes, Clim Dev, 10, 289, 10.1080/17565529.2017.1374236 · DOI
- 2014, Electric power consumption (kWh per capita) - Tanzania, World Bank Open Data
- Dupraz, 2011, Combining solar photovoltaic panels and food crops for optimising land use: towards new agrivoltaic schemes, Renew Energy, 36, 2725, 10.1016/j.renene.2011.03.005 · DOI
- Giri, 2022, Agrivoltaic system: experimental analysis for enhancing land productivity and revenue of farmers, Energy Sustain Dev, 70, 54, 10.1016/j.esd.2022.07.003 · DOI
- Amaducci, 2018, Agrivoltaic systems to optimise land use for electric energy production, Appl Energy, 220, 545, 10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.03.081 · DOI
- Mouhib, 2024, Enhancing land use: integrating bifacial PV and olive trees in agrivoltaic systems, Appl Energy, 359, 10.1016/j.apenergy.2024.122660 · DOI
- Maitima, 2009, The linkages between land use change, land degradation and biodiversity across East Africa, Afr J Environ Sci Technol, 3
- Schindele, 2020, Implementation of agrophotovoltaics: techno-economic analysis of the price-performance ratio and its policy implications, Appl Energy, 265, 10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.114737 · DOI
- Nasir, 2018, Solar PV-based scalable DC microgrid for rural electrification in developing regions, IEEE Trans Sustain Energy, 9, 390, 10.1109/TSTE.2017.2736160 · DOI
- Moner-Girona, 2018, Electrification of Sub-Saharan Africa through PV/hybrid mini-grids: reducing the gap between current business models and on-site experience, Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 91, 1148, 10.1016/j.rser.2018.04.018 · DOI
- Abdelrazik, 2022, Climate action: prospects of solar energy in Africa, Energy Rep, 8, 11363, 10.1016/j.egyr.2022.08.252 · DOI
- Patel, 2024, Techno-economic analysis of agrivoltaic system for affordable and clean energy with food production in India, Clean Technol Environ Policy, 10.1007/s10098-023-02690-1 · DOI
- Muchunku, 2018, Diffusion of solar PV in East Africa: what can be learned from private sector delivery models?, WIREs Energy Environ, 7, e282, 10.1002/wene.282 · DOI
- Vollprecht, 2021, Legal framework of agrivoltaics in Germany, AIP Conf Proc, 2361, 10.1063/5.0055133 · DOI
- Pascaris, 2021, Examining existing policy to inform a comprehensive legal framework for agrivoltaics in the U.S, Energy Pol, 159, 10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112620 · DOI
- Tajima, 2022, Comparative study on the land-use policy reforms to promote agrivoltaics, AIP Conf Proc, 2635, 10.1063/5.0115906 · DOI
- Dias, 2019, Interplay between the potential of photovoltaic systems and agricultural land use, Land Use Pol, 81, 725, 10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.11.036 · DOI
- 2015, Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, Resolut Adopt Gen Assem, 42809, 14
Metadata
- Authors
- Randle-Boggis, R. J., Barron-Gafford, G. A., Kimaro, A. A., Lamanna, C., Macharia, C., Maro, J., Mbele, A., & Hartley, S. E.
- Affiliations
- World Agroforestry Centre (KE)
- University of Sheffield (GB)
- Venue
- Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2025-02
- Volume
- 208
- Pages
- 115066
- ISSN
- 1364-0321 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4403973825
- Cited by
- 54
- References
- 59
- Citations by year
- 2026: 26 · 2025: 27
- FWCI
- 6.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (submittedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Photovoltaic Systems and Sustainability
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Water-Energy-Food Nexus Studies
- Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Solar Thermal and Photovoltaic Systems
- Keywords
- agrivoltaics, water-energy-food nexus, off-grid electrification, photovoltaic modules, crop yield, water conservation, irrigation water demand, rainwater harvesting, climate resilience, energy security, Sustainable Development Goals, East Africa, Tanzania, Kenya, low-carbon electricity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review