Cited by 167Intergenerational and Educational Inequality StudiesRacial and Ethnic Identity ResearchCritical Race Theory in Education

Pigmentocracies: Educational inequality, skin color and census ethnoracial identification in eight Latin American countries

Open access
Telles, Edward, Flores, René D., Urrea-Giraldo, Fernando·2015·Research in Social Stratification and Mobility

Abstract

For the first time, most Latin American censuses ask respondents to self-identify by race or ethnicity allowing researchers to examine long-ignored ethnoracial inequalities. However, reliance on census ethnoracial categories could poorly capture the manifestation(s) of race that lead to inequality in the region, because of classificatory ambiguity and within-category racial or color heterogeneity. To overcome this, we modeled the relation of both interviewer-rated skin color and census ethnoracial categories with educational inequality using innovative data from the 2010 America's Barometer from the Latin American Public Opinion Project (LAPOP) and 2010 surveys from the Project on Ethnicity and Race in Latin America (PERLA) for eight Latin American countries (Bolivia, Brazil, Colombia, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, Guatemala, Mexico and Peru). We found that darker skin color was negatively and consistently related to schooling in all countries, with and without extensive controls. Indigenous and black self-identification was also negatively related to schooling, though not always at a statistically significant and robust level like skin color. In contrast, results for self-identified mulattos, mestizos and whites were inconsistent and often counter to the expected racial hierarchy, suggesting that skin color measures often capture racial inequalities that census measures miss.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.rssm.2015.02.002

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • When race is utilized as a descriptive category, the choices about what categories to use and how to assign individuals to categories significantly impacts the results of analysis.

    “When race is utilized as a descriptive category, the choices about what categories to use and how to assign individuals to categories significantly impacts the results of analysis [18, 102, 114, 115].”

    From Towards a critical race methodology in algorithmic fairness (2020) · cites this paper as [114]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 63 · Cited by 167

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Andrews, G. R. (2004). Afro-Latin America. Oxford University Press.
  2. Brown, T. D., Dane, F. C., & Durham, M. D. (1998). Perception of race and ethnicity. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 13(2), 295-306.
  3. Fradera, J. M. (May 2010). Does caste become class in Spanish America? In Paper presented at the Conference on Race in the Americas. University of Chicago.
  4. Knight, A. (1990). In R. Graham (Ed.), Racism, revolution and indigenismo: Mexico 1910-1940. The idea of race in Latin America, 1870-1940 (pp. 71-113). Austin: University Of Texas Press.
  5. Martinez Casas, R., Saldivar Tanaka, E., Flores, R., & Sue, C. (2014). The different faces of mestizaje: Ethnicity and race in Mexico. In Pigmen- tocracies: Race, ethnicty and color in Latin America. University of North Carolina Press.
  6. Stutzman, R. (1981). El Mestizaje: An all inclusive ideology of exclusion. In N. E. Whitten Jr. (Ed.), Cultural transformation and ethnicity in modern Ecuador (pp. 45-94). Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
  7. Sulmont, D., & Callirgos, J. C. (2014). El Pais de Todas las Sangres? Race and ethnicity in contemporary Peru. In Pigmentocracies: Race, ethnicity and color in Latin America. University of North Carolina Press.
  8. Wade, P. (1993). Blackness and race mixture: The dynamics of racial identity in Columbia. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

Authors
Telles, E., Flores, R. D., & Urrea-Giraldo, F.
Affiliations
  • Princeton University (US)
  • University of Washington (US)
Corresponding author
Telles, Edward
Venue
Research in Social Stratification and Mobility
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-06
Volume
40
Pages
39-58
ISSN
0276-5624 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1994860669
Cited by
167
References
63
Citations by year
2026: 26 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3
FWCI
32.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Research in Social Stratification and Mobility (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Greater South Information System
Funders
Ford Foundation (400-4209)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Intergenerational and Educational Inequality Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Critical Race Theory in Education
Keywords
educational inequality, skin color, self-identification, racial classification, racial hierarchy, indigenous peoples, mestizos, mulattoes, educational attainment, Latin America, colorism

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review