CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 20Aviation Industry Analysis and TrendsMerger and Competition AnalysisFirm Innovation and Growth

An empirical model of fleet modernization: On the relationship between market concentration and innovation adoption by airlines

Open access
Oliveira, Alessandro V.M., Caliari, Thiago, Narcizo, Rodolfo R.·2022·Research in Transportation Business & Management
DOI 10.1016/j.rtbm.2021.100704
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.rtbm.2021.100704

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 31

  1. Aghion, P., Bloom, N., Blundell, R., Griffith, R., & Howitt, P. (2005). Competition and innovation: An inverted-U relationship. The quarterly journal of economics, 120(2), 701-728.
  2. Aghion, P., Blundell, R., Griffith, R., Howitt, P., & Prantl, S. (2009). The effects of entry on incumbent innovation and productivity. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 91(1), 20-32.
  3. Albers, S., Daft, J., Stabenow, S., & Rundshagen, V. (2020). The long-haul low-cost airline business model: A disruptive innovation perspective. Journal of Air Transport Management, 89, 101878.
  4. Askenazy, P., Cahn, C., & Irac, D. (2013). Competition, R&D, and the cost of innovation: Evidence for France. Oxford Economic Papers, 65(2), 293-311.
  5. Baldwin, W., & Scott, J. (2013). Market structure and technological change (Vol. 1). Taylor & Francis. Belloni, A., Chen, D., Chernozhukov, V., & Hansen, C. (2012). Sparse models and methods for optimal instruments with an application to eminent domain. Econometrica, 80(6), 2369-2429.
  6. Belloni, A., Chernozhukov, V., & Hansen, C. (2014a). Inference on treatment effects after selection among high-dimensional controls. The Review of Economic Studies, 81(2), 608-650.
  7. Belloni, A., Chernozhukov, V., & Hansen, C. (2014b). High-dimensional methods and inference on structural and treatment effects. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 28(2), 29-50.
  8. Beneito, P., Rochina-Barrachina, M. E., & Sanchis, A. (2017). Competition and innovation with selective exit: An inverted-U shape relationship? Oxford Economic Papers, 69(4), 1032-1053.
  9. Bérubé, C., Duhamel, M., & Ershov, D. (2012). Market incentives for business innovation: Results from Canada. Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, 12(1), 47-65.
  10. Brueckner, J. K., & Pai, V. (2009). Technological innovation in the airline industry: The impact of regional jets. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 27(1), 110-120.
  11. Caves, D. W., Christensen, L. R., & Tretheway, M. W. (1984). Economies of density versus economies of scale: why trunk and local service airline costs differ. The RAND Journal of Economics, 471-489.
  12. Chandler Jr., A. D. (1994). The competitive performance of US industrial enterprises since the Second World War. The Business History Review, 1-72.
  13. Chernozhukov, V., Hansen, C., & Spindler, M. (2015). Post-selection and post-regularization inference in linear models with many controls and instruments. American Economic Review, 105(5), 486-90.
  14. Taylor & Francis.
  15. Damanpour, F. (1991). Organizational Innovation: A Meta-Analysis of Effects of Determinants and Moderators. Academy of Management Journal, 34(3), 555-590.
  16. Frambach, R. T., & Schillewaert, N. (2002). Organizational innovation adoption: A multi-level framework of determinants and opportunities for future research. Journal of Business Research, 55(2), 163-176.
  17. Franke, M. (2007). Innovation: The winning formula to regain profitability in aviation?. Journal of air transport management, 13(1), 23-30.
  18. Fudenberg, D., & Tirole, J. (1984). The fat-cat effect, the puppy-dog ploy, and the lean and hungry look. The American Economic Review, 74(2), 361-366.
  19. Jansen, P. W., & Perez, R. E. (2016). Coupled optimization of aircraft families and fleet allocation for multiple markets. Journal of Aircraft, 53(5), 1485-1504.
  20. Kamien, M. I., & Schwartz, N. L. (1982). Market structure and innovation. Cambridge University Press.
  21. Kilpi, J. (2007). Fleet composition of commercial jet aircraft 1952-2005: Developments in uniformity and scale. Journal of Air Transport Management, 13(2), 81-89.
  22. Kreps, D. M., & Wilson, R. (1982). Reputation and imperfect information. Journal of Economic Theory, 27(2), 253-279.
  23. Leamer, E. E. (1978). Specification Search: Ad Hoc Inference with Nonexperimental Data. New York: Wiley.
  24. Magnus, J. R., Powell, O., & Prüfer, P. (2010). A comparison of two model averaging techniques with an application to growth empirics. Journal of Econometrics, 154(2), 139-153.
  25. Milgrom, P., & Roberts, J. (1982). Predation, reputation, and entry deterrence. Journal of Economic Theory, 27(2), 280-312.
  26. Nash, C., Matthews, B., & Smith, A. (2020). The impact of rail industry restructuring on incentives to adopt innovation: A case study of Britain. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit, 234(3), 331-337.
  27. Polder, M., & Veldhuizen, E. (2012). Innovation and competition in the Netherlands: Testing the inverted-U for industries and firms. Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, 12(1), 67-91.
  28. Rogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of innovations (4th edition). The Free Press.
  29. Tibshirani, R. (1996). Regression shrinkage and selection via the Lasso. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological), 58(1), 267-288.
  30. Treloar, A. E. (1999). Products and Processes: How Innovation and Product Life-Cycles Can Help Predict the Future of the Electronic Scholarly Journal. In ELPUB.
  31. Zou, L., Yu, C., & Dresner, M. (2015). Fleet standardisation and airline performance. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy (JTEP), 49(1), 149-166.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Oliveira, A. V. M., Caliari, T., & Narcizo, R. R.
Affiliations
Instituto Tecnológico de Aeronáutica (BR)
Corresponding author
Oliveira, Alessandro V.M.
ORCID
Venue
Research in Transportation Business & Management
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-06
Volume
43
Pages
100704
ISSN
2210-5395 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.rtbm.2021.100704
OpenAlex
W3196464453
Cited by
20
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1
FWCI
2.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Research in Transportation Business & Management (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Funders
  • Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (2015/19444-1, 2020/06851-6)
  • Coordination of Higher Education Personnel Improvement
  • Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (301344/2017-5, 301654/2013-1)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › General Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Aviation Industry Analysis and Trends
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Merger and Competition Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Firm Innovation and Growth
Keywords
fleet modernization, market concentration, innovation adoption, aircraft procurement, inverted U-shaped relationship, competition, low-cost carriers, fuel prices, energy costs

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review