Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 266

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 102 of the 102 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

On the utilization of principal component analysis in laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy data analysis, a review

Pořízka, Pavel, Klus, Jakub, Képeš, Erik, Prochazka, David, Hahn, David W., Kaiser, Jozef·2018·Spectrochimica Acta Part B: Atomic Spectroscopy

Abstract

Abstract An implementation of a fast, robust, and effective algorithm is inevitable in modern multivariate data analysis (MVDA). The principal component analysis (PCA) algorithm is becoming popular not only in the spectroscopic community because it complies with the qualities mentioned above. PCA is, therefore, often used for the processing of detected multivariate signal (characteristic spectra). Over the past decade, PCA has been adopted by the Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy (LIBS) community and the number of scientific articles referring to PCA steadily increases. The interest in PCA is not caused only by the basic need to obtain a fast data visualization on a lower dimensional scale and to inspect the most prominent variables. Most recently, PCA has also been applied to yield unconventional data analyses, i.e. processing of large scale LIBS maps. However, a rapid development of LIBS-related instrumentation and applications has led to some non-uniform methodologies in the implementation and utilization of MVDA, including PCA. Thus, in this work, we critically assess and elaborate on the approaches to utilize PCA in LIBS data processing. The aim of this article is also to derive some implications and to suggest advice in data preprocessing, visualization, dimensionality reduction, model building, classification, quantification and non-conventional multivariate mapping. This review reflects also other MVDA algorithms than PCA and consequently, presented conclusions and recommendations can be generalized.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.sab.2018.05.030

Cites

102 of 102 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 102 references

Metadata

Authors
Pořízka, P., Klus, J., Képeš, E., Prochazka, D., Hahn, D. W., & Kaiser, J.
Venue
Spectrochimica Acta Part B: Atomic Spectroscopy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-10
Volume
148
Pages
65-82
ISSN
0584-8547 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2805674144
Cited by
266
References
102
FWCI
14.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: On the utilization of principal component analysis in laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy data analysis, a review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.sab.2018.05.030
The paper
Pořízka, P., Klus, J., Képeš, E., Prochazka, D., Hahn, D. W., & Kaiser, J. (2018). On the utilization of principal component analysis in laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy data analysis, a review. Spectrochimica Acta Part B: Atomic Spectroscopy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sab.2018.05.030

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.