Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 247

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Yeast alpha glucosidase inhibitory and antioxidant activities of six medicinal plants collected in Phalaborwa, South Africa

Open access
Shai, L.J., Masoko, P., Mokgotho, M.P., Magano, S.R., Mogale, A.M., Boaduo, N., Eloff, J.N.·2010·South African Journal of Botany

Abstract

Recent decades have experienced a sharp increase in the incidence and prevalence of diabetes mellitus. One antidiabetic therapeutic approach is to reduce gastrointestinal glucose production and absorption through the inhibition of carbohydrate-digesting enzymes such as α-amylase and α-glucosidase and α-amylase. The aim of the current study was to screen six medicinal plant species, with alleged antidiabetic properties for α-glucosidase inhibitory activities. Powdered plant materials were extracted with acetone, and tested for ability to inhibit baker's yeast α-glucosidase and α-amylase activities. The largest mass (440 mg from 10 g) of the extract was obtained from Cassia abbreviata, while both Senna italica and Mormordica balsamina yielded the lowest mass of the extracts. Extracts of stem bark of C. abbreviata inhibited baker's yeast α-glucosidase activity with an IC50 of 0.6 mg/ml. This plant species had activity at low concentrations, with 1.0 mg/ml and above resulting in inhibition of over 70%. The other five plant extracts investigated had IC50 values of between 1.8 and 3.0 mg/ml. Senna italica only managed to inhibit the activity of enzyme-glucosidase at high concentrations with an IC50 value of 1.8 mg/ml, while Tinospora fragosa extracts resulted in about 55% inhibition of the activity of the enzyme at a concentration of 3.5 mg/ml, with an estimated IC50 value of 2.8 mg/ml. The bark extract of C. abbreviata was the most active inhibitor of the enzyme, based on the IC50 values (0.6 mg/ml). The bark extract of C. abbreviata contains non-competitive inhibitor(s) of α-glucosidase, reducing Vmax value of this enzyme from 5 mM·s–1 to 1.67 mM·s–1, while Km remained unchanged at 1.43 mM for para-nitrophenyl glucopyranoside. Antioxidant activity of the extracts was also investigated. The C. abbreviata extract was more active as an antioxidant than the positive control, trolox. The extracts did not inhibit alphaamylase activity more than about 20% at the highest concentration tested.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.sajb.2010.03.002

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 247

Metadata

Authors
Shai, L. J., Masoko, P., Mokgotho, M. P., Magano, S. R., Mogale, A. M., Boaduo, N., & Eloff, J. N.
Venue
South African Journal of Botany
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-08
Volume
76
Issue
3
Pages
465-470
ISSN
0254-6299 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1998560276
Cited by
247
References
0
FWCI
3.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Yeast alpha glucosidase inhibitory and antioxidant activities of six medicinal plants collected in Phalaborwa, South Africa. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.sajb.2010.03.002
The paper
Shai, L. J., Masoko, P., Mokgotho, M. P., Magano, S. R., Mogale, A. M., Boaduo, N., & Eloff, J. N. (2010). Yeast alpha glucosidase inhibitory and antioxidant activities of six medicinal plants collected in Phalaborwa, South Africa. South African Journal of Botany. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sajb.2010.03.002

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.