Cited by 45Qualitative Research Methods and ApplicationsFocus Groups and Qualitative MethodsHealth Policy Implementation Science

Use of Rapid Assessment Procedures when analyzing qualitative data in pharmacy research

Renfro, Chelsea Phillips, Rome, Zoe, Gatwood, Justin, Hohmeier, Kenneth C.·2022·Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy

Abstract

Qualitative research analytics and methodology are a useful part of many research projects. However, qualitative data analysis may be time intensive causing delays in results. This is especially problematic in time-sensitive projects where there an urgent need for results and a rapidly evolving situation being studied, such as during health crisis or early stages of project implementation. An emerging body of literature around the use of Rapid Assessment Procedures (RAP) suggests that this method of qualitative assessment provides more efficient coding and categorizing of data without comprising rigor. The objectives of this manuscript are to: 1) describe how RAP can be used in pragmatic healthcare research studies and 2) provide an example of when RAP was applied to a qualitative research study in the healthcare setting. RAP includes 5 core features: 1) use in combination with quantitative outcomes or process data (mixed methods approach), 2) quick timeline from start to finish (weeks to months), 3) population of interest participation in planning and implementing the research, 4) team approach to research process, and 5) iterative cycle of data collection and analysis. Use of RAP provides key stakeholders and decision makers the ability to generate solutions to problems faster than ever before without compromising rigor, a method needed now more than ever. The progression of healthcare and clinical management is moving at an unprecedented rate, and RAP allows researchers to stay ahead by providing quicker results for better outcomes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.sapharm.2021.05.013

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Pharmacy practice research has seen a steady increase in published qualitative studies in the last two decades.

    “Pharmacy practice research has seen a steady increase in published qualitative studies in the last two decades. 9,10”

    From Research and scholarly methods: Thematic analysis (2023) · cites this paper as [10]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Renfro, C. P., Rome, Z., Gatwood, J., & Hohmeier, K. C.
Affiliations
University of Tennessee Health Science Center (US)
Corresponding author
Hohmeier, Kenneth C.
Venue
Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-01
Volume
18
Issue
1
Pages
2249-2253
ISSN
1551-7411 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3167408649
Cited by
45
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 7
FWCI
7.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Qualitative Research Methods and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
Keywords
rapid assessment procedures, qualitative data analysis, pharmacy research, mixed methods, stakeholder engagement, research efficiency
MeSH terms
Pharmacy Research, Health Services Research, Humans, Research Design, Research Personnel, Qualitative Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review