The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Predicting protein function from sequence and structural data
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Protein Structure Comparison by Alignment of Distance Matrices
Holm, L., & Sander, C. (1993) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1006/jmbi.1993.1489 · Cited by 3,984 · cited 1×
“Several methods exist for fold searching, the best known being DALI [11]; other well-known methods include SSM [12] and GRATH [13], which use graph theory, VAST [14], which uses vector alignment of secondary structures, and CE [15], which employs combinatorial extension.”
Method
Cited by
A large-scale evaluation of computational protein function prediction
Radivojac, P., Clark, W. T., Oron, T. R., Schnoes, A. M., Wittkop, T., Sokolov, A., Graim, K., Funk, C., Verspoor, K., Ben-Hur, A., et al. (2013) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.2340 · Cited by 1,028
Zinc through the Three Domains of Life
Andreini, C., Banci, L., Bertini, I., & Rosato, A. (2006) · Journal of Proteome Research · doi:10.1021/pr0603699 · Cited by 648
Protein Function Prediction Using Local 3D Templates
Laskowski, R. A., Watson, J. D., & Thornton, J. M. (2005) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2005.05.067 · Cited by 213
Self-citationGPU-accelerated homology search with MMseqs2
(2025) · doi:10.1038/s41592-025-02819-8 · Cited by 71
Metadata
- Authors
- Watson, J. D., Laskowski, R. A., & Thornton, J. M.
- Venue
- Current Opinion in Structural Biology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2005-06
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 275-284
- ISSN
- 0959-440X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2043199972
- Cited by
- 315
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 1.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
