What does structure tell us about virus evolution?
Abstract
Viruses are the most abundant life form and infect practically all organisms. Consequently, these obligate parasites are a major cause of human suffering and economic loss. The organization and origins of this enormous virosphere are profound open questions in biology. It has generally been considered that viruses infecting evolutionally widely separated organisms (e.g. bacteria and humans) are also distinct. However, recent research contradicts this picture. Structural analyses of virion architecture and coat protein topology have revealed unexpected similarities, not visible in sequence comparisons, suggesting a common origin for viruses that infect hosts residing in different domains of life (bacteria, archaea and eukarya).
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Structural analysis has been proposed to provide insights into the common ancestry of distantly related viruses following the discovery of fold conservation between viruses that infect highly divergent branches on the tree of life.
“Structural analysis has been proposed to provide insights into the common ancestry of distantly related viruses following the discovery of fold conservation between viruses that infect highly divergent branches on the tree of life [30].”
From Vesivirus 2117 capsids more closely resemble sapovirus and lagovirus particles than other known vesivirus structures (2017) · cites this paper as [30]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Stability and dynamics of virus capsids described by coarse-grained modeling
Arkhipov, A., Freddolino, L., & Schulten, K. (2006) · Structure · doi:10.1016/j.str.2006.10.003 · Cited by 262 · see citing works
Conley, M., Emmott, E., Orton, R., Taylor, D., Carneiro, D. G., Murata, K., Goodfellow, I. G., Hansman, G. S., & Bhella, D. (2017) · Journal of General Virology · doi:10.1099/jgv.0.000658 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
- Authors
- Bamford, D. H., Grimes, J. M., & Stuart, D. I.
- Affiliations
- University of Helsinki (FI)
- Centre for Human Genetics (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Bamford, Dennis H
- Grimes, Jonathan M
- Stuart, David I
- Venue
- Current Opinion in Structural Biology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2005-12
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 655-663
- ISSN
- 0959-440X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2075526101
- Cited by
- 384
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 27 · 2012: 27
- FWCI
- 2.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Current Opinion in Structural Biology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Bacteriophages and microbial interactions
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Enzyme Structure and Function
- Keywords
- viral evolution, viral origin, virus structure, virosphere, Eukarya, bacteria
- MeSH terms
- DNA Viruses, Herpesviridae, Models, Molecular, Phylogeny, Protein Conformation, RNA Viruses, Viruses, Genome, Viral, Evolution, Molecular, Capsid Proteins
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review