Cited by 30Protein Structure and DynamicsSupramolecular Self-Assembly in MaterialsBiochemical and Structural Characterization

Design and designability of protein-based assemblies

Zhang, Jian, Zheng, Fan, Grigoryan, Gevorg·2014·Current Opinion in Structural Biology

Abstract

Design of protein-based assemblies is an exciting frontier in molecular engineering. It can be seen as an extension of the protein design problem, but with some added hurdles. In recent years, much of the focus in the field has been on patterning existing protein structural units (proteins, oligomers, or structural motifs) to design diverse assembly geometries, focusing on symmetry to encode both "infinite" lattices and finite-sized supramolecular particles. Despite impressive successes, several key challenges remain. Among these are the specificity problem the need to engineer preference for the intended assembly geometry over all alternatives, and the folding problem--understanding what thermodynamic or kinetic features of assembly subunits and inter-subunit interfaces lead to successfully folding superstructures and how to encode these in the amino-acid sequence. Here we focus on recent results in the context of these two problems, summarizing commonalities in successful approaches. We find that natural designability of assembly elements (i.e., their compatibility with diverse populations of natural amino-acid sequences) may be a unifying property of successful designs.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.sbi.2014.05.009

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhang, J., Zheng, F., & Grigoryan, G.
Affiliations
Dartmouth College (US)
Corresponding author
Grigoryan, Gevorg
Venue
Current Opinion in Structural Biology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-08
Volume
27
Pages
79-86
ISSN
0959-440X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2084651390
Cited by
30
References
2
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 1
FWCI
0.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Current Opinion in Structural Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
NSF (CNS-1205521)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Supramolecular Self-Assembly in Materials
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Biochemical and Structural Characterization
Keywords
protein design, designability, supramolecular self-assembly, symmetry, molecular engineering
MeSH terms
Proteins, Protein Engineering, Protein Structure, Secondary, Protein Folding, Protein Structure, Quaternary, Protein Multimerization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review