Cited by 179Resilience and Mental HealthStudent Stress and CopingOptimism, Hope, and Well-being

Resilience, vulnerability and mental health

Open access
Haddadi, Parvaneh, Besharat, Mohammad Ali·2010·Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences

Abstract

This study investigated the association of resilience with indices of vulnerability including psychological distress, depression, and anxiety; and mental health in a sample of students. 214 (97 boys, 114 girls) were included in this study. All participants completed Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC), Mental Health Inventory (MHI), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI), and General Health Questionnaire (GHQ). resilience was positively associated with psychological well-being and negatively associated with psychological distress, depression and anxiety. Psychological health and vulnerability indices are influenced by different levels of resilience through self-esteem, personal competence and tenacity, tolerance of negative affect, control, and spirituality.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.07.157

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Loneliness and isolation can diminish resilience, leaving individuals more vulnerable to anxiety and depression.

    “Consequently, loneliness and isolation can diminish resilience, leaving individuals more vulnerable to anxiety and depression [99].”

    From The prospective association of adolescent loneliness and low resilience with anxiety and depression in young adulthood: The HUNT study (2025) · cites this paper as [99]

    The Discussion (page not provided) reports that resilience is negatively correlated with depression and anxiety. The paper does not examine loneliness or isolation as causes of reduced resilience, and it notes that its correlational method limits causal interpretations. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. Carle, A. C., & Chassin, L. (2004). Resilience in a community sample of children of alcoholics: its prevalence and relation internalising symptomatology and positive affect. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 25, 577-596.
  2. Charney, D. S. (2004). Psychobiological mechanisms of resilience and vulnerability: implications for adaptation to extreme stress. American Journal of Psychiatry, 161, 195-216.
  3. Garmezy, N. (1985). Stress-resistant children: the search for protective factros. In J. E. Stevenson (Ed.), recent research in developmental psychopathology. Journal of Child Psychology; Psychiatry Book Supplement No. 4 (pp. 213-133). Pergamon: Oxford.
  4. Goldberg, D. P. (1972). The detection of psychiatric illness by questionnaire. Maudsley Monograph, 21, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  5. Richardson, G. E. (2002). The metatheory of resilience and resiliency. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 58, 307-321.
  6. Rutter, M. (1985). Resilience in the face of adversity: protective factors and resistance to psychiatric disorder. British Journal of Psyhiatry, 147, 598-611.
  7. Taghavi, M. R. (2001). Assessing reliability and validity of the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ). Journal of Psychology, 4, 381-398.
  8. Veit, C. T., & Ware, J. E. (1983). The structure of psychological distress and well-being in general population. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 51, 730-742.
  9. Zautra, A. J., Johnson, L. M., & Davis, M. C. (2005). Positive affect as a source of resilience for women in chronic pain. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 73, 212-220.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Haddadi, P., & Besharat, M. A.
Affiliations
University of Tehran (IR)
Corresponding author
Haddadi, Parvaneh
Venue
Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010
Volume
5
Pages
639-642
ISSN
1877-0428 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2013875999
Cited by
179
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 4
FWCI
59.23
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Resilience and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Student Stress and Coping
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Optimism, Hope, and Well-being
Keywords
resilience, vulnerability, mental health, psychological distress, depression, anxiety, students, psychological well-being, self-esteem, personal competencies, tenacity, spirituality, perceived control

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review