Gender representation in EFL materials: an analysis of English textbooks of Iranian high schools
Open accessAbstract
The present study was an attempt to examine different areas of gender-bias in representation of women and men in 3 volumes of English textbooks taught in the high schools of Iran. Chi-squares were performed to find the frequency of names, nouns, pronouns and adjectives attributed to women and men. Also, chi-square was carried out to investigate whether women and men had more or less equal first-place occurrences in instructions, exercises and sentences. Furthermore, the other areas which were investigated were: 1. reading passages to find whether women and men appeared more or less equally or not, 2. male-generics and 3. animals. The findings revealed that the manifestation of women and men in these textbooks was not fair. In other words, the presence of men was more highlighted than that of women regarding names, nouns, pronouns and adjectives attributed to them. In regard to firstness, also, male-attributed terms came first more frequently than those of females. In reading passages, male characters appeared more frequently than female characters. Moreover, these textbooks contained many male-generics in which women were almost invisible. Also, sexism was detected in regard to animal representations.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Some studies used secondary level textbooks for analyzing gender stereotypes.
“First, some studies used secondary level textbooks for analyzing gender stereotypes [60,61,63,64,70–72,78,80,82,98,99].”
From Gender stereotypes and education: A comparative content analysis of Malaysian, Indonesian, Pakistani and Bangladeshi school textbooks (2018) · cites this paper as [72]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Islam, K. M. M., & Asadullah, M. N. (2018) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0190807 · Cited by 196 · see citing works
A Portrait of Gender Bias in the Prescribed Indonesian ELT Textbook for Junior High School Students
Ariyanto, S. (2018) · Sexuality & Culture · doi:10.1007/s12119-018-9512-8 · Cited by 91 · see citing works
Evaluation of the English language coursebooks used at the Turkish public elementary schools
SOLHİ, M., SAK, M., ŞAHİN, Ş., & YILMAZ, S. (2020) · Dil ve Dilbilimi Çalışmaları Dergisi · doi:10.17263/jlls.803714 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
“…(Davcheva & Sercu, 2005), possessing a fundamental role in structuring the language learning lesson (Gray, 2006), introducing culture and values (Bahman & Rahimi, 2010), helping both as a syllabus and as a framework of classroom progress (Tsiplakides, 2011), providing similar content to…”
Background
- Authors
- Bahman, M., & Rahimi, A.
- Affiliations
- Tehran University of Medical Sciences (IR)
- University of Kashan (IR)
- Corresponding author
- Bahman, Masoumeh
- Venue
- Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2010
- Volume
- 9
- Pages
- 273-277
- ISSN
- 1877-0428 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2006927324
- Cited by
- 81
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 14.82
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Studies in Language
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Media, Gender, and Advertising
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
- Keywords
- gender representation, gender bias, EFL textbooks, women in textbooks, animal representation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review