The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Gender Differences in Quality of Life, Intensity of Dysfunctional Attitudes, Unconditional Self-acceptance, Emotional Distress and Dyadic Adjustment of Infertile Couples
Open accessAbstract
Infertility is a stressor that affects infertile couples. Aim - to examine gender differences in quality of life (QoL), dysfunctional attitudes, unconditional self-acceptance, emotional distress and dyadic adjustment. Results -There is a significant gender difference in emotional and mind-body dimension of QoL, no significant gender difference in QoL relational and social dimension, intensity of dysfunctional attitudes, unconditional self-acceptance, emotional distress, dyadic adjustment. There are significant correlation between these parameters and dimensions of FertyQoL. Infertile couples (especially women) are at risk of a decreased quality of life when diagnosed and undergoing fertility treatment, so they should be provided psychological support.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“در تبیین یافته حاضاار باید اشاااره کرد که درمان مبتنی بر پذیرش و اه درم اانجوی اان می تعه اد ب آموزد ک اه خود را ب اه عنوان زمین اه تجساا اع و ادراک ( نم اای اد .)9”
From The Effectiveness of Treatment Based on Acceptance and Commitment to the Health-Enhancing Lifestyle and Emotional Distress of Women Undergoing Infertility Treatment with in Vitro Fertilization (2025) · cites this paper as [9]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Verhaak, C. M., Smeenk, J. M. J., van Minnen, A., Kremer, J. A. M., & Kraaimaat, F. (2005) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/dei015 · Cited by 346
Gender Differences in Coping with Infertility: A Meta-Analysis
Jordan, C. B., & Revenson, T. A. (1999) · Journal of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1023/a:1018774019232 · Cited by 273
Why are infertile patients not using psychosocial counselling?
Boivin, J. (1999) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/14.5.1384 · Cited by 192
Psychological aspects of infertility
Edelmann, R. J., & Connolly, K. (1986) · British Journal of Medical Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.2044-8341.1986.tb02686.x · Cited by 169
Beaurepaire, J., Jones, M., Thiering, P., Saunders, D. M., & Tennant, C. C. (1994) · Journal of Psychosomatic Research · doi:10.1016/0022-3999(94)90118-x · Cited by 158
Hjelmstedt, A., Andersson, L., Skoog-Svanberg, A., Bergh, T., Boivin, J., & Collins, A. (1999) · Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica · doi:10.1034/j.1600-0412.1999.780110.x · Cited by 143
Webb, R., & Daniluk, J. C. (1999) · Men and Masculinities · doi:10.1177/1097184x99002001002 · Cited by 137
Gender differences in response to infertility and infertility investigations: Real or illusory
Edelmann, R. J., & Connolly, K. (2000) · British Journal of Health Psychology · doi:10.1348/135910700168982 · Cited by 79
Kowalcek, I., Wihstutz, N., Buhrow, G., & Diedrich, K. (2001) · Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics · doi:10.1007/s004040100187 · Cited by 26
Cited by
Li, J., Long, L., Liu, Y., He, W., & Li, M. (2015) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.brat.2015.12.010 · Cited by 120
Gabriel, A. S., Arena, D. F., Calderwood, C. C., Campbell, J. T., Chawla, N., Corwin, E. S., Ezerins, M. E., Jones, K. P., Klotz, A. C., Larson, J. D., et al. (2022) · Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks · doi:10.1108/s0742-730120220000040007 · Cited by 48
Maierhaba, A., Xu, H., Abuduguli, A., Zhao, W., He, L., & Zhang, C. (2023) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1138282 · Cited by 21
Li, J., Hong, L., & Long, L. (2018) · Nursing Open · doi:10.1002/nop2.232 · Cited by 16
Li, J., Luo, H., & Long, L. (2019) · Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology · doi:10.1080/02646838.2019.1577958 · Cited by 15
Metadata
- Authors
- Haica, C. C.
- Affiliations
- Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy (RO)
- Corresponding author
- Haica, Cristiana C.
- ORCID
- Haica, Cristiana C.
- Venue
- Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2013-05
- Volume
- 78
- Pages
- 506-510
- ISSN
- 1877-0428 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2019563218
- Cited by
- 15
- References
- 9
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 4.35
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Reproductive Health and Technologies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
- Keywords
- infertility, infertile couples, gender differences, quality of life, dysfunctional attitudes, unconditional self-acceptance, emotional distress, dyadic adjustment, infertility treatment, psychological support
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
